bouncer
← Back

Podcast Travis Kalanick & Michael Dell Live from Austin, Texas

All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg · 1:15:56 · 28d ago

Queued Transcribing Analyzing Complete
65% Moderate Human

"Be aware of 'parasocial leveraging' where the hosts' personal friendship with Kalanick is used to bypass critical questioning regarding his past leadership or the actual viability of his new 'atoms-based computer' concept."

MildModerateSevere

Transparency

Mostly Transparent

Primary Technique

Parasocial leveraging

Leveraging the one-sided emotional bond you form with creators you watch regularly. Because you feel like you "know" them, their opinions carry the weight of a friend's advice rather than a stranger's. Creators can monetize this by blurring genuine sharing with paid promotion.

Horton & Wohl's parasocial interaction theory (1956); Reinikainen et al. (2020)

The episode features Travis Kalanick announcing his new company 'Atoms' and Michael Dell discussing the future of AI infrastructure and Texas as a tech hub. Beneath the surface, it uses 'revelation framing' to present Kalanick’s years in 'stealth mode' as a period of profound intellectual labor rather than a forced exile, effectively laundering his reputation through the hosts' enthusiastic social validation.

Listen

Provenance Signals

The content is a live recording of a high-profile podcast featuring authentic, unscripted dialogue with natural linguistic imperfections and complex interpersonal dynamics. The presence of specific, real-world business details and spontaneous humor confirms human creation.

Natural Speech Patterns The transcript contains numerous filler words ('I mean', 'like', 'yeah'), self-corrections, and interruptions ('Is he kind of like secret saying...', 'No, now he's all about it').
Contextual Specificity Detailed references to specific global brand names (Namah, Kitchen Valley) and personal anecdotes about stealth mode and investor relations.
Live Event Dynamics Audience interaction ('On the count of three...') and real-time conversational flow between multiple speakers (Jason, Travis, Michael Dell).
Episode Description
(0:00) Travis Kalanick: Officially exiting stealth mode, what he's been working on (5:52) How to automate the physical world, markets to go after (11:00) Return to self-driving: Tesla, Waymo, and the autonomous race (16:17) Leaving Los Angeles for Austin, the decline of truth and justice in California (25:51) Actuators, robot hands, "Capital as a weapon," Middle East SWF impacted by Iran War (36:00) Michael Dell: Dorm room to $140B in annual revenue, why Texas attracts founders (43:46) Dell's $50B AI infrastructure bet (1:03:50) Invest America: Michael Dell's $6.25B gift - A 401k from birth for 25M kids This podcast was recorded LIVE at Arena Hall in Austin, Texas. Thanks to our partners for making this event possible!: EY: Austin vibes meet AI innovation. Thanks to EY for co‑hosting with us at #SXSW. Discover what executives are saying about AI transformation in the latest AI Pulse Survey. https://ey.com/en_us/insights/emerging-technologies/pulse-ai-survey Forge Global: We're proud to highlight our partners at Forge Global, who are helping the world's most innovative private companies and their teams gain #liquidcourage on their terms. Learn more here: https://forgeglobal.com/who-we-serve/private-companies/ De'Longhi Athena Polymarket

Worth Noting

This episode provides a rare, detailed look at the strategic pivot of a major tech founder into industrial automation and the specific infrastructure requirements for the next phase of AI scaling.

Be Aware

The 'conversational consensus' between the hosts and guests prevents any meaningful scrutiny of the social or economic risks associated with automating the mining and food industries.

Influence Dimensions

How are these scored?
Kalanick's 'stealth' period is framed as a heroic choice of 'hard mode' focus → The controversial circumstances of his Uber exit and subsequent industry reputation are entirely omitted → This benefits Kalanick's ability to recruit and raise capital for his new venture.

Character flattening

Reducing a complex person to one defining trait — hero, villain, genius, fool — stripping away nuance that would complicate the narrative. Once someone is labeled, everything they do gets interpreted through that lens.

Fundamental attribution error (Ross, 1977); Propp's narrative archetypes (1928)

The 'atoms-based computer' metaphor → It assumes that physical logistics and mining can be abstracted into software-like logic without the friction of labor, regulation, or physical degradation, which are highly contestable real-world constraints.

Generalization

Taking one or a few specific examples and presenting them as proof of a widespread pattern. A single story becomes "this is what always happens." Concrete examples are vivid and memorable, so the leap to a general rule feels natural but is often unjustified.

Hasty generalization fallacy; Kahneman & Tversky's representativeness heuristic (1972)

16:17 → California/Los Angeles is characterized as a place where 'truth and justice' have declined → This serves to validate the move to Texas as a moral and intellectual necessity rather than just a tax or business strategy.

In-group/Out-group framing

Leveraging your tendency to automatically trust information from "our people" and distrust outsiders. Once groups are established, people apply different standards of evidence depending on who is speaking.

Social Identity Theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979); Cialdini's Unity principle (2016)

About this analysis

Knowing about these techniques makes them visible, not powerless. The ones that work best on you are the ones that match beliefs you already hold.

This analysis is a tool for your own thinking — what you do with it is up to you.

Analyzed: 28d ago
Transcript

I don't know if some of you knew I was an angel investor in some companies. On the count of three, what's my favorite angel investment of all time? One, two, three. Thank you. Give it up, Travis Kalanick. Appreciate you. All right. Wow. On a big news day, Travis is here on a very big news day. You spent, wow, I guess like seven years just in the lab building. Last year, every year I ask you, hey, you want to come to the Women's Summit? You want to say, no, it's like I'm going to just chill. I'm building. Next year, hey, you know, it's just always available to you. I'm like, no, you don't understand. I'm stealth. Yeah, stealth. I'm stealth. Nobody knows where I am. Nobody knows what I'm doing. The employees are not allowed to put the name of the company on their LinkedIn. Thousands of employees that weren't allowed to put the company name on LinkedIn. I mean, incredible. And I'm like, okay. Their parents thought they worked for the CIA. Yeah. And then he's like, and by the way, J. Cal, you can invest. You can't announce it. And you have to sign in and you can't mention you're an investor. It's like, okay, no problem. I'm just happy to be on the cap table. Is he kind of like secret saying what he wasn't supposed to say? Yeah, right. No, now he's all about it. That just happened. No. Well, you can't. No, you're out now. F*** it. Let's go. You're out. It's out. You came out of stealth today. It's so funny. It's so great. You came out of stealth? Well, you talked a little bit. You came to All-In Summit last year. Is that true? Is that fair? You say you're coming out of stealth today? Is that right? Well, look, let's just start with what that meant for our employees. Because, again, imagine if you're at a multi-thousand person company and every single employee has stealth on their LinkedIn, including salespeople, including recruiters. like it was they were they were living life on hard mode it's kind of fun too right i mean i mean yeah it was like kind of cool what is this why are there why is this massive density of stealth right startup people in los angeles what is happening over there yeah yeah also technically the name of the company in different countries was very generic names of companies i mean everything was designed to be stealth. Right. So we operate in 30 countries. In the US, the kitchen's product is known as Cloud Kitchens. In Korea, it's Kitchen Valley. In the Middle East, it's Namah. In Latin America, parts of Latin America, it's Casinos Equeltas. I mean, you get the idea. You can't even remember all the names and all the code words. I have to think about it. Yeah. To think it through. We have four in China. Yeah. It's like all over the place. Yeah. But things have gone really well and you've been a little acquisitive. So tell us about the branding today that you're announcing and then maybe some of the acquisitions and evolution of the company. You're not just renting kitchen space. Those who, I mean, know how I thought about things in the Uber day, a lot of this stuff's not surprising. I would often talk about digitizing the physical world. I think I even did it all at Summit. The quick version of this, I'll try to do it quickly, but it's like we know the bits world, the computer world, the one that Michael Dell essentially invented for us. CPU, storage, network. These are three core computing resources when you go to computer science class your first day. Three core computer resources. CPU manipulates the bits. Storage stores the bits. Network moves bits from point A to point B. But if you're digitizing the physical world, you're treating atoms like bits. You're building an atoms-based computer. And I'll explain what I mean this way. I know this is a little out there. CPU manipulates bits. What manipulates atoms? Manufacturing. Storage stores bits. What stores atoms? Real estate. Network moves bits from point A to point B. What moves atoms? That's transportation or logistics. So you have these three core computing resources in an atoms-based computer. The name of my company was very obtuse and purposely designed to be as boring as hell. It was called City Storage Systems. So that's digitized real estate in an atoms-based computer, our first computer being a food computer. What does that mean? Manufacturing real estate and logistics for food. And so you start to get there. And the idea, the mission was infrastructure for better food. The idea was, can you get a meal that's prepared and delivered to you so efficient that it starts to approach the cost of going to the grocery store? If you can do that, you do to the kitchen what Uber did to the car. But in the Uber day, the roads were there. The cars are unused. You just had to put an app in the app store. It wasn't that easy, but kind of that easy. In this world, you can't do this on a restaurant. When I left Uber, 13% of all San Francisco miles were Uber miles. And that was 10, nine years ago. You can't get there on food, on restaurants. They have like 20% capacity. Uber Eats and DoorDash fill it. But the infrastructure to do high capacity, high scale sort of industrial production is just not there. And the logistics is just not there. It just doesn't work. That's why on e-commerce, you go through Amazon big-ass warehouses with awesome logistics. You've got to do the same thing when food goes to e-commerce. That was a lot. Okay. So bottom line is it's awesome. We do this food computation stuff. We're doing more computers now. And so the name of the company is called Atoms. and it's let's say the mission uh is um is uh physical automation to transform industries and move the world and so we have our food computer talked about then we do we're doing mining mining as in mining not data mining we're talking about atoms guys yeah so of course you do some mining data mine too, but the point is physical mining, so automation of mines. And the mission there is more productive mines to power Earth's industries. So it's got this industrial atoms vibe to it. And then on the transport side, it's a wheelbase for robots. Because if you're doing specialized robots, not humanoids, specialized robots, you need to be able to move and act in the physical world. But the minute you're moving, you've got to have a wheelbase. So it's just part of the equation. And a lot of people go, look at Tesla, it's great. Look at Waymo, awesome. They're cruising around Austin, of course. But there's so many things that move. It's not just a ride-sharing thing. and so obviously including mining equipment that's doing its thing so you guys that's the general sort of idea and we acquired a company on the mining stuff a company called pronto or it's about to close it's we're we're inches from closing is the way to put it what were they doing what was their business pronto automating mining equipment were they based uh they're based in san francisco so you and i were starting to talk about this backstage but there's some folks i talked to in the mining industry who mentioned, you know, like the big issue with mining, number one is just surveying, like finding the locations, right? Is there an advantage to be created there? Because I know there's a couple startups that are trying to be really smart about selecting locations to get the targets out of the ground. Yeah. And then the other one is like, well, can you go deep? Because pretty much anywhere on earth, you can get whatever you want, if you're willing to go deep enough, but the cost is distance squared, right? So the energy cost is like, how deep are you going to the second power. So it becomes geometrically more expensive to go deeper. But the deeper you go, the more you're able to not worry about getting the right location. So does automation unlock that capacity? I mean, automation definitely does. I mean, also, it's like, man, does Boring Company have some good stuff going? I hope we're doing the mining thing and Boring Goes makes some good tunnels for cars to do the thing, but there's some kind of boring mechanism, automated tunneling to do some of this. But to be honest, they have this thing that's like rare earths. I don't know why they put plural. Rare earths, isn't it? Rares earth? I don't know. But the... Rare earth. Yeah. But it's not rare. It's not uncommon. Guys, it's not rare. It's what you have to do to the land is aggressive. And what's rare is where are the places they'll let you do it that you can also sort of get people to. When you automate, you can go to a lot of places. Well, first is all the mines that exist are way more productive. And the second is you can then sort of justify going to places you wouldn't have been able to go before because you don't have as much of a labor footprint or a safety issue or a whole bunch of other things. that then so it was inhospitable if it's regulated if it's like i don't want to live there it's the end of the earth yeah you can send robots and have people monitoring them remotely yeah and this is like a future that feels like a little bit like science fiction look we're here in you got to do the shout out to tesla and all the things because i like to sort of break down the physical AI stack includes not just like, oh yeah, computation, and I've got to have physical AI models, and I've got to do all the things you sort of think of. What about land development? That should be in that stack. What about chemistry? That needs to be in the stack. Manufacturing needs to be a stack. When you look at the stack, you're like, damn, Tesla's got this. They are the Google of this era, which is what I mean by that is in the 2000s, if you were doing a startup in the 2000s, the first question you would get is, why isn't Google going to kill you? Or why isn't Google just going to do it? They're not going to know that they killed you. And before that, Microsoft. And before that was Microsoft, the late 90s. Uber had a time, 2010s. Yeah, but if Uber puts that in the app. Come on. It's like, dude, this is Uber. But I think in the physical AI space, that's sort of a Tesla thing. But there's so many things to do. you got to shoot your shot i gotta do some stuff and rumors that um hey you might not be done with self-driving something that you were very early on how do you think about what you're seeing in the playing field of self-driving because my lord you know waymo's making great progress tesla's making great a winner like pick a winner between tesla tesla waymo uber or like uber seems to be building a network of stuff yeah i mean the number of pick a winner the number of players in this space is crazy now right yeah look there's i think there's more noise if there's more bark than there is bite right now um look i think waymo obviously is ahead the existence proof is there their issue is manufacturing and scale um and urgency and fierceness like yes come on let's win Let's go. Uber had an autonomy project back in the day, and they have a different strategy these days. I haven't been there for a while. But the point is, so you've got Waymo. Then you've got Tesla, fundamentals, science, hard mode times 100. And the question is, do they get there in what timescale? if if they and like honestly everybody's like could happen tomorrow could happen in five years and i think that it's like when does the chat gpt moment happen for vision is basically the thing let's call it vision without other sensors so super inspiring but like what's the timeline on it yeah um those are the base this is basically the and then there's a lot of other little guys that don't really have the stuff I believe yet. There's nobody standing out just yet of the others. Do you think we're at a point now, like obviously now that you're getting into more of these kind of autonomous systems that move around, like do we have these vision language action models tuned and ready for prime time? There's been a conversation like, who's going to have the Android, the operating system for vision language action where I can use my voice, tell it to do something, and it knows what I'm saying, and then it identifies the objects and does the thing in the physical world. Do those models exist today or they still work? And is that like a Google OS? Or like, where does that OS come from? Look, I think this is an area of a lot of energy, a mix of research and implementation. I think there's a lot of hope and interesting stuff. I mean, the high level is, we all remember what happened when you use ChatGPT 3.5. and you're like, holy shit. Yeah, it's legit. Whoa. And then it went to four and you're like, okay, like some stuff just changed. The world just changed and I can sort of connect some dots and shit getting real. Is it about to happen? Is it about to happen for physical AI? And that's what this is about. Yeah. And the fun part about it is machine learning, deep learning, this kind of thing for many years, decades was like inscrutable. I don't know what the thing is thinking. It just spits out an answer, and I know it's correct. Well, now you can have a conversation with it. Right? Like, imagine if it's driving your car, and there's different agents, and one's just driving, the other's like, yo, look out over there. Yeah. It's like, oh, just like how we roll. If somebody does that, you're like, honey, that's like 200 meters away. We're going to be okay. We're okay, yeah. Jason and I don't call each other honey, but I got you. Yeah. like sweetie you know yeah okay so anyways that was odd wasn't it okay okay i didn't mean it that way i didn't mean it yeah yeah you know i meant it okay language is a beautiful compression mechanism that humans use a hundred watts of energy like and you put that in a scheme of things of like ai training ai energy the power plants that are built to do the thing that isn't even at human strength yet. Okay. The Waymo machine takes a hundred times more energy to drive a Waymo than a human does to drive a Waymo. So, so language, we, there are still things that humans are great at and that unbeaten, like the goat, we're still the goat at certain things. Language is this epic compression. And, um, we need to find ways to compress. Cause like when you think about how we first started looking at the physical world is we saw everything. And you know what, guys? And this is sort of obvious. It doesn't matter what the cloud is doing if I'm driving. But the car doesn't know that. It's pulling in every freaking data point and processing everything. And look, they've been about sort of carving out the things that don't matter and things like this. But there's ultra awesome versions of this. And you can imagine how you can use language or things that look like language to communicate either amongst agents or sort of safety systems with a driving system to sort of get very efficient answers and to identify safety issues very efficiently. People don't know that you've moved to Texas as of, well, most people don't know, but it's out there. Yeah. You moved here in December, so now you're a resident of Austin. Yeah. Thank you. it's very exciting for me we've been getting to play some backgammon backgammon cards cards we're having a good time so i've had a place on lake austin since 2021 and uh i go there i'm an avid water skier like you're impressed about water skiing i have to say like so i've had a place in austin for five years freaking love it it's my weekend i would go 15 weekends a year. What do you think is going to happen in California? It's pretty messed up. Look, I grew up in Cali. I grew up in Los Angeles. My parents were born and bred in Los Angeles, which basically makes them the founders of LA. So I have a lot of heart, my whole family, everything. It's pretty... I don't want to... A lot of us feel that way. I don't want to get the violin out but it just but it's heartbreaking the play it totally wait it's just the place you grew up it's your home you know when you have to leave uh but it's getting weird out there and uh it feels like it's getting weirder and at some point that's it's just too weird it's too weird do you think everyone's gonna leave i mean it started with elon and it was like yeah he was we don't we don't want elon here and then he's like message received right and then it kind of worked its way down the tech industry and in the kind of you know world of people building businesses and whatnot and now it's kind of gotten so broad in terms of the group of people comedy music new yorkers restaurateurs i mean this place is the i'm not even talking about this i'm just talking about everyone leaving la or sorry leaving california is almost like working down this path of look my the rest of my team's like we're when are we moving you know they're like and how are you dealing with that so that was the question was like gotta buy homes on the lake there are literally dozens of startup ceos of call it successful or growing companies that i talked to who are like dude i want to leave but i got employees here i got an office here i got a facility here i build stuff here yeah how am i gonna leave yeah i totally get it. It's a real thing. So look, I think like most things, uh, sort of when it's time and it feels painful to do something sometimes it actually not as bad as you think And you just got to make the move and lead and do it And so that kind of the process almost like a mourning process I went through. And that's just what it is. And you're setting up a team here? Yeah, of course. And I got that office right on the lake. Did you get that? We are negotiating. No, it's all good. No, no, no, it's all good. We're negotiating right now. But I'm going to jet ski to work. no literally it's a true story last year we were like driving up the thing and I was like wow I wonder who owns that he's like I will and I was like did you look at it he's like I looked at that and I was like that would be a nice one but the truth is and I had a couple people move here a couple years ago and they all had the same reaction oh my god I'm living in a place that's twice as big for half as much the people here are dope the food is dope everybody here has got this sense that we're building the future and it's just fun and world positive. And, you know, for me, I got to live New York, LA, San Francisco. I did three of the great cities in this country. This one feels the most like home to me, which is a very strange feeling to me, but it feels like everybody here wants to build the future and it's very diverse, you know, like all these different industries and people pursuing stuff. I think this is the future. Yeah. Here's the thing. Like you go to san francisco and i still have a little nostalgia when i go to san francisco just having built uber there and the whole thing um i still get the you know the butterflies just i do you know but it does have something magical you just can't take it away and then you look at all of these bike lanes and these bus lanes that never have a bus or a bike in them and cost 400 million to build one mile. And it's literally, it's sort of like this subconscious desire to choke the city off. Now remember, I look at things through roads. That's how I think. So I'm just like, obviously the city is totally busted. Yeah. They literally took Market Street and they're like, what would be the optimal way to f*** this up and virtue signal at the same time? And they're like, yeah, buses. And it's like, nobody's on the bus. nobody takes the bus it's a beautiful small town that whole street is empty that whole street is empty it's painted red okay so okay so we all bitch and complain non-stop when are you like i'm number one i get it but freeberg when are you leaving okay well on the chat you're the best right now i'm like okay so let me just by the way there's a couple glasses of wine in public facing friedberg yeah and he's like you know i think there's a better way to do this and then there's like darth friedberg in group chat he's like these people these morons are they're destroying society he is like darth friedberg in group chat am i lying am i lying is he the most correct especially after a couple glasses of wine yeah when i start drinking i fall off a cliff and he takes pictures he's like fourth beverage and we're like oh it's worth staying up on the group chat And then I'm like, I'll go and attack this congressman on Twitter, which I realize is probably not like the best. Yes, and then you go delete the tweet. Don't delete the tweet. Yeah, I delete the tweets. Okay, so there's a group of people trying to raise $500 million to create like a tech slash business coalition to go to Sacramento, which arguably is something that everyone's left and avoided doing forever because no one wants to spend time in freaking Sacramento fighting politicians. but it's almost like we're all falling off a cliff. It's time to do something. Do you think there's a realistic path back? Do you think that people can actually get their together that even if 500 million came in, there's a way to kind of turn around the state, fix some of the policies. You think it's too late? I don't think that, but look, I would go look, anybody who's doing anything to fix things. I'm like, hell yeah, let's do something. The issue is we all grew up in a tech world, which was like a libertarian place where you stay out of politics. And that kind of, it was that kind of vibe. It was just, everybody was like that. Leave me alone. I want to make stuff. Yeah, just, I'm not, I don't do that. And that's obviously, there's not a thing anymore. In California, I think the ballot initiatives are very powerful. And there's very clean ways to get something on the ballot. Love that. I think that your DAs who have decided we do not enforce crime at all anymore. That's like a sweet spot. I sort of have this aphorism. Truth and justice are the immune system for society. When the immune system is suppressed, all the social ills flare up. So look for the places where truth and justice are being deteriorated, are being degraded, and say, how do we get at that? because if you get at that, everything else downstream will be better. So that's kind of how I look at things and how I also determine whether the world's getting better or worse. When I say weird, I'm talking about truth and justice. That's what I mean when I say, oh, man, it's getting weird. It's getting weirder, which means it's weird. I'm just talking about truth and justice. Well, I mean, and you look at the homeless industrial complex, you look at Chesa Boudin, which the all-in pod, Sax, myself, and the pod, like we literally led the recall of him. And then you have the same thing going on in L.A. where they were just like if somebody… Gascon. Yeah, Gascon. I mean, we basically lost the script. You're running the city for the criminals. It literally is like a Batman movie. It's like Bane. Oh, you want to arrest the criminals. Look, I was born in the darkness. I mean, these guys are f***ing lunatics. Yeah, look, I know police officers in Los Angeles who are no longer police officers. And these are lifelong guys who protect and serve. That's in their bloods or DNA. They want to protect people. They want the bad guys to be dealt with. And they almost have PTSD from what it is like to want to serve and see bad things happening and not being allowed to stop it. yeah nobody's got their back and they're not allowed to do their job it's it's crazy and i it's getting weird okay hey i want to just go back to ai sorry for the darkness i don't know i think it's good i was trying to induce i'm trying to induce dark freeberg well i brought it up yes i mean someone bring me a tequila i'll get going yeah let's do it can we get a couple it was funny i went on this podcast yesterday and the guy and the first the guy was like the first hour was middle of the road i was talking about tech and science and then like politics came up he's like so socialism and he said like you lost it and then you were like he's like the energy with 10x and it was yeah so it'll come out in a couple weeks but i was like it got me going okay i want to talk about physically i one more time yeah so one of now that now that you're doing this i saw a presentation the other day someone showed like a video of a squirrel jumping from one tree to another tree and they're like a tenth of a watt or something yeah like like the biology is tuned and it's so perfect in terms of its efficiency of energy utilization to do physical things and we're taking these like big things of metal and motors and like actuators and if you add up or you compound all of the inefficiencies in the system it's like 1200 watts to get the robot to walk four foot like yeah like break apart not just the software but the hardware layer and where are we at in evolving things like actuators and the materials and everything else that's going to make physical ai work and scale look a lot with the questions you're asking are going down humanoid lane which is like this thing and everybody talks about how do you do the hand it's almost like terminator 2 type obsession with the hand which is fair like it's a very critical part of it i mean look at the i like to look at the achilles the quote-unquote achilles tendon of any of these machines. And you're like, that's where the action is. This is a couple other places. Look, I'm in the non-humanoid space. I mean, but mechanical engineers have been dealing with actuators and, you know, all the sort of electromechanical sort of interactions that make machines do certain things. But like, I'm in the food machine space. So I can tell you how to open a paper bag and put a bowl in a paper bag without tearing the paper bag. But I am less into the, I forget the name, the senses to understand awareness and touch. I'm not in that game. So when you're mining, you're like, you're not like, you know, you're not playing tennis. certain things may be equivalent to tennis so look the bottom line is we're seeing obviously all you have to do is go online and look at where the humanoids are going over time and how much better they're getting it's wild and it's happening so freaking fast but any humanoid demo starts with dancing and martial arts. And we're sort of down specialized robot lane, which is gainfully employed robots. So I know I didn't totally answer the question on the technology piece. I just like, do you agree that there's probably like a big opportunity for venture money and research to go into material science? Yes, for sure. because if the physical AI stack manipulation and all of the related things around it is massive. And so if you get the software working, it's almost like the hardware has to catch up. We got a lot of investments to be made. Well, actually, it's good that you bring this up. One of the things you pioneered at Uber was capital as a weapon. And you were very thoughtful about, hey, if we can take this capital off the table, then that's going to let's call it what it is it's going to be an advantage versus the competitors and these other competitors couldn't get that capital that's now i think people have seen that playbook and they're like sam mom was like that was smart let me try and it's at a different scale now that you've come out of stealth yeah now that you've got and people are starting to understand just starting today yeah how big your vision is capital as a weapon yeah this is i guess in your plan. Yeah. Well, I mean, here's the thing, right? So capital as a strategic weapon for its own sake is not a thing, but when it is actually a strategic weapon, then it is a thing. And what I mean by that is like in the Uber world early days, if you didn't have capital, it didn't matter how good your app was because Masa is going to put a billion dollars into your competitor and you're going to lose 20% market share tomorrow. So a critical competency, in fact, your world-class competencies, one of them has to be raising capital and you need to do it better than everybody else. And if you don't, you are going to lose. Let me ask one follow up to that. But the Middle East. I've heard theories the last couple of days that big capital seekers are kind of right now because of what's going on in the Middle East with the Iran war. Dubai, Qatar, Saudis are kind of going to close up the capital flowing to the US right now. And is that real? I mean, do you think that's a real threat? So look, our Middle East business was supposed to go public in January, and the Saudi market went down 20% over like a two-month period. And that was like a massive damper on the situation. Now, part of that was because the oil prices had gone down so dramatically. And if you went into KSA, you went to the kingdom, everybody's like, we need oil prices to go up. But that's the other side of the equation. So I don't know what happened. I'm not in the market raising money right at this moment. And this is a two-week-old thing that I, look, I see the news just like everybody else. And I'm not out there calling while a war is going on and saying, hey, guys, you got some money? So I don't know exactly what's going to happen. But if you are an optimist and you're like, okay, this is not going on forever. Just like the tariffs, it was the end of the world and then it wasn't very quickly. If you're an optimist about this situation and it won't be the end of the world, maybe even a better world, then we get to a better place. And I think progress, abundance, the golden age happens. And a lot of it is about all the things that are happening in AI, in physical AI, and just the productivity gains that are coming in very massive ways. Yeah, I mean, it was shock and awe, and then, hey, now we've got a steady state, and let's hope that's what happens in Iran, is that we can depose these evil dictators and replace it with something a little more stable. And related to this, before we wrap, they're going to China, the big trade deal being negotiated. What do you hope comes out of this Chinese thing? And what did you learn in China? Yeah, what would you learn, and what do you think would be great for America? Like, what would you like to see and be like, man, that's going to set us all up? Look, here's the thing. If you go to China right now and you go and just take a tour of the manufacturing that's going on there, just the manufacturing base, the cities, especially if you've gone to China for a couple decades in a row, you're like, damn. Yeah. So let's just do two things. You go to Shenzhen, which before felt like Kansas City, but 50 years ago and really humid, which I guess is Kansas City sometimes. but you go there now and it's like one upping Singapore right or so that's the city view you're just experiencing a very awesome you're like this is advanced and you just get the vibe and it's everywhere and then you go and you start seeing the manufacturing base and you see what like Xiaomi is doing or any of the other there's so many scrappy guys badass guys everywhere and you're like, F. They're hungry. So does anybody remember the 2008 Olympics in Beijing? Anybody? Does anybody, this is a little bit, you're down a rabbit hole. Does anybody remember the opening ceremony? And you're like, these mofos are taking over. At least that's what they want to do. That shit's happening. So I don't have any issue or this is not negativity for me. I'm like, these guys are killing it the best idea is winning they're fiercely they're fiercely going after truth and progress and they're making happen let's step up our game okay but we can also have a friendly game like we don't have to like be like the detroit pistons in the 90s you know yes we can we there's a way into the stands yeah yeah you know there's a way to do this right and there's a way to do it like adults, I hope that's where we would end up. I have an employee who, because for a long time, we're the largest kitchen builders in China. I have an employee in China, has an American wife. They both live in China. They're both from China originally. But it would be great for him to work here on some things I'm doing. It's very hard to make that happen right now. Now, that's selfish. Maybe selfish like I'm like, there's a person I've been working with for over a decade. I'd love to continue here. Maybe there's other bigger picture items that I'm not dealing with. I'm not the geopolitical guy, but I'd love for them to be sort of good relations and good... If you have a significant other who is an American citizen, Like, do we have to make that hard as an example? Some normalcy would. Something. You know, I'm just saying now I agree. Like there are ways to do immigration properly. Like we effed it up super bad. Don't even get me started. But there's also there's good migration to like a lot of great innovators all over the place came from other places for their own version of the American dream. God bless. Freiburg. And we don't have to – that doesn't have to be a negative thing. And so I'd like to see more of that. And, yeah, China is wild. So let's keep our eye on the ball and let's give them a run for their money too. Give it up for TK. Well done, brother. Thank you. That's good. Good to see you, brother. Wow. Michael Dell. My Lord. Texas native. Yes, born in Houston. Well, I missed the opening. We jumped to the music, but you started Dell Computer here in Austin with $1,000. 42 years ago in my dorm room at Adobe, UT, about 10 days before I finished my freshman semester. Amazing. And it's been working out pretty good. Yeah, it's been some bumps in the road, but it's generally worked out okay. We'll have about $140 billion in revenue this year. Yeah, it's okay. It compounds over time, doesn't it? Yeah, yeah. You start small and just keep adding, and there you go. That's how it goes. Yeah, exactly. It's just that easy. But why Texas? I think this is an important thing. We're in Austin. Jason lives here. David Sachs lives here now. More people are moving from California to Austin. Why Austin? Why Texas? Why is it work here and it's getting better? Is it just always worked? You know, I think Texas has had a, you know, low tax pro growth environment for a long time and pro, you know, sort of progressive business climate. And, you know, if you sort of look at the growth of the Texas economy relative to the rest of the United States without Texas, you know, Texas just kind of looks like a better version of the U.S. economy. And you know now you got Austin is sort of just about in the top 10 cities in the United States So you got when that happens you have four of the 10 largest cities in America in Texas One out of 10 children born in the United States born in Texas More New York Stock Exchange companies in Texas than in New York or anywhere else. and you've got the University of Texas here in Austin, which I always think of as kind of the wellspring for a lot of the companies that are here, certainly ours. And a long history of innovative pioneering spirit and entrepreneurship, and it's been a fantastic place for us. And part of this, I think, Freeberg and Michael is what's happened in the other great cities or what were once great cities. My hometown, New York, got to spend 10 years in L.A. and the last 12 in the Bay Area. And what's happening there is incredibly un-American and they're decelerating when compared. I think maybe the gap maybe in the disparity from these two locations has gotten greater. And you're seeing a lot more people say life there here in Austin seems a lot better than the life I'm living in New York, L.A., or in the Bay Area. Yeah, well, I've got a lot of new friends and neighbors that have come. And certainly, I mean, if you look at the migration statistics, Texas has attracted an enormous number of people. And look, I mean, when you look at the environment here and compare it to the other kind of situations that are going on, it's very attractive. But, you know, it's kind of been great for a long time. So it's not really news to us that have been here a while. Yeah, Elon had a great experience when he was building the Gigafactory over here. They let you do stuff here, basically. They let him build it, which he said was like an incredible experience for him because in California, they didn't let him build these factories. In fact, the Tesla factories that in Fremont was just an old ancient factory that he was able to retrofit. So there's something going on here as well with the data centers, and that's actually, I think, very close to what you're working on at Dell. Maybe you could talk a little bit about the data center boom that's going on in Texas that maybe people aren't paying attention to. Sure. Well, there's, you know, obviously been enormous build out of AI infrastructure and that requires, you know, lots of new data centers, lots of power. Texas, you know, has an enormous advantage there relative to other states. A lot of power, a lot of land and it's and and you can build stuff. Right. So there's there's been a massive build out, particularly in some of the cities in towns in West Texas where there's not a lot of population. And so they're not really too opposed to having data centers out in the middle of nowhere where there's land and power. And so, yeah, I mean, the the the demand for tokens is enormous. You know, we've been building these AI data centers, not just here in Texas, but around the world. And, you know, the growth in that has been tremendous. You know, we introduced the first H100 server. It was literally a couple of weeks before ChatGPT was announced. and you know uh the progression of our business in that area has sort of gone from like 2 billion to 10 billion to 25 billion to this year it'll be like 50 billion so so tremendous growth and when when you think about what these models are creating there's this phase change that's happened in computing right we we had 60 years of calculating and computing, now we have machines that are thinking and helping us think. And so the demand for that kind of intelligence and, you know, the models are amazing, but they're also the worst they'll ever be, and they continue to improve. And so we just see a lot more demand than supply. And it's happening not just in the hyperscalers and the cloud service providers. It's happening in 4,000 enterprises where we're building these Dell AI factories. It's happening in sovereign AI, you know, like Palantir. And, you know, people want to protect their data but also use AI on it. They want to bring the AI to where their data is. And, you know, when this kind of started a few years ago, we had some really sophisticated large companies. Think of like Fortune 100. And they started, you know, buying these AI servers from us and they kind of knew what they were doing. Right. And we said, well, what are you doing? And they were kind of taking and building their own models. They were taking open source models. They were running them. Some of them were algorithmic traders or, you know, derivatives of machine learning. And, of course, they needed a lot of help in doing that because it was sort of a complicated thing. So about two years ago, we put together this product that we called the Dell AI Factory. And now we've got 4,000 plus of these, and it's kind of running rampant across enterprises. How do you think about the payback time on the investment that's being made? The administration put in place this accelerated depreciation rule. Yeah, that's very helpful, actually. Just for folks to understand that a little bit, if you spend $100 billion this year building data centers and buying infrastructure for those data centers, you get to write off 100% of that this year to deduct it. So you don't pay taxes. You pay much fewer taxes. And that's in place for 10 years, I think. That's a 10-year deal. Right, right. So it's accelerating the investment. How much is that helping versus how are you seeing folks rationalize the investment relative to the return they're going to make and over what timescale? This is still the big question. Is the money really there? The hyperscalers, maybe they're starting to come up at end usage, end states. Are we kind of, hey, wait and see? We don't know yet. or folks are getting 20% ROIC starting in year one after they've made the investment? You know, I can tell you, in our business, in our company, we definitely see plenty of use cases where the ROI or the improvement in productivity efficiency is 20% or greater. Right away it gets there. I mean, you know, it's not like you just hit a button and you get 20%, right? There's work required in thinking through the processes, and it's worth a little bit describing that. So when you have any company, its processes and tools and technology are a function of what was available at the time it created those things. And so what you sort of have to do is step back and say, all right, what's the trajectory of the improvement of the tools? What outcome are we trying to create? And now let's simplify and standardize the processes, get all the tools together, get all the data together, and then apply the technology. And this really has to be done in kind of a tops down way. You can't sort of do it spontaneously. Silos are not going to spontaneously improve themselves. And often that means that you're completely changing the way the organization works. It's like a wholesale re-architecture. It's a reimagining of the way a company works. And, you know, I mean, the way I described this to our team about three years ago is, you know, we were going to have a new competitor five years from now. That would be two years from now. You know, that was in every business that we're in, except they were going to be faster and more innovative and more successful and lower cost. And they were going to put us out of business. And the only way we were going to prevent that is we're going to become that company. And here's how we're going to do it. And, you know, it excited some people. It scared some people. But I actually believe that that's what's going to happen. And so we've been dramatically changing our business. I would say the biggest benefit by far is speed. We're much faster at being able to apply innovations. And so, you know, you look at our infrastructure business last quarter grew 73%. Well, that's kind of unusual for a business of this size. and uh you know this quarter we guided that it would grow even faster like 100 so you've lived through a couple of paradigm shifts here the pc revolution obviously you led that and then you of course had a you know client server the network revolution online uh internet internet cloud mobile yeah so each one of those we saw massive disruption we're talking in the green room about, hey, we used to have a typing pool. There was a mail room. All these things got abstracted away by the PC and networked PC revolution. But it took a decade or two. And this one's happening a lot faster. Yeah. Yeah. This one, I think it's like, you know, a quarter is like a year. Maybe it's five times faster or something like that. But back to your question, I would say maybe 10 or 15 percent of large companies have really figured this out and the rest of them are kind of fumbling around. And, you know, there's a tendency when you hear about a new technology to like, oh, let's just go do it. You know, show the boss, hey, we did AI. The board said we got to do AI. We got to do AI. We need AI. Are you proud of me, boss? Yeah. Look at what I made. Exactly. And I also think, you know, there's an important point about this, which is, you know, the barrier to technology adoption is not technology. It's culture and leadership and courage, right? And so – Willingness to change and to protect yourself. Yeah, and, you know, if you're in a business that you don't think is changing very much or, you know, change is really hard, right? You have to be very uncomfortable. You're like, well, we're going to stop doing that. Well, we don't need this anymore. Particularly if your bonus is dependent on not messing things up. But let's use the Internet as an analogy, which you saw up close. There were businesses that were Internet transition successful. They made the transition, maybe Macy's.com versus Sears Roebuck, right? Right, right. Maybe Macy's did a better job of taking advantage of the Internet than Sears. But then there was internet native businesses that seemed to blow them all out. And maybe Amazon's a good example or CSN stores, whatever they be, Wayfair, etc. What's the right way to think about this evolution in industries generally? Are we going to have businesses that are going to transition successfully and those that aren't, and they're going to die? And are we going to see AI native businesses in every industry come in and just disrupt everything? I believe we will. And certainly, you know, when you talk to the Collison brothers at Stripe, they'll tell you that the rate of growth of the 2025 cohort companies is about four times faster than the 2018 companies. And so every year, the new batch of companies are growing faster and faster because they're starting with all these new tools that, you know, because they see all the new companies on their platform. Exactly. And so when you think about an incumbent company that already exists, it has, let's say it's got brands, it's got balance sheets, it's got customer relationships, whatever stuff. But that's sort of like, those are expiring value assets. If it doesn't change quickly and get on the other side of this, I think it will go out of business, which is exactly the speech I gave to our team three years ago. And I think, you know, you have to be bold and you got to go make those changes to not only survive this, but to thrive. I think about it as how do we prepare our company to be ready for the 2030s? Right. Isn't it like it's much more – it's kind of the storyline. There's more to do than there ever was. It's like when the internet kind of came around, Sears doesn't just need to sell locally. They can sell to the world. Well, sure. I mean this is the point. And the AI lets everyone do everything. When we have better tools, we can do way more things, right? And, you know, when I hear people say, oh, you know, maybe we're just going to have all these great tools and we won't do more things. We'll just do the same things with fewer people. It doesn't sound right to me. I mean, there'll be some of that, but I think most of it will be we're just going to do a whole lot more things. We're going to solve a lot more problems. We're going to accelerate scientific discovery. We're going to invent all sorts of new things. We're going to solve all sorts of problems that haven't been solved. And, you know, that's super exciting. What do we have wrong on infrastructure? So the original build cycle looked a lot like everything's in a data center. Everything's got to sit there. That's where all the intelligence, it'll all be in these kind of hosted proprietary cloud models. Do you think that it's open source? Is it distributed on the edge? Where does the intelligence, where does the inference sit? and how does that really change or kind of re-architect the industry, do you think? It's really all the above. I mean, it's not like there's one answer. I mean, certainly if you go to any industrial company or natural resources company, advanced manufacturing, retail, logistics, there's tons of inference at the edge. And that's growing very, very fast. And, you know, we make a lot of that embedded equipment. Certainly, you know, telcos are doing that, too. I mean, it's pretty much every industry. Think about wherever data is being created. You want the AI infrastructure and the inference, you know, close to the data. You know, there has been this sort of rebalancing as companies have figured out, you know, sort of everybody loves the public cloud, right, until they get the bill. Right. They get the bill. This is supposed to save us money. Yes. Cost quite a bit more. So, you know, the lowest cost token is going to be the one that's generated right where the data is on the device. You're going to have tokens being generated on your phone, on your PC, in every embedded piece of equipment. And look, we have an interesting perspective on this business because we have 10,000 customers where they embed our product in their product. This is, you know, think medical devices, security, all sorts of things in hospitals and industrial plants and, you know, any any kind of, you know, data driven activity requires some kind of computing network storage infrastructure. So when you look at the desktop where you started, it's coming full circle, and this must be at least very interesting or intriguing to you that you see this open claw movement, everybody trying to buy the most powerful desktop they can, and all these hobbyists who were your customers who were calling you up and ordering from Dell, their bespoke PC. Dell.com. What did I say? Dell.com. You said ordering from Dell, calling us up. They order online usually. They order online now, yes. We have this thing called the Internet. They do, yes. It works out pretty well. But this is incredible that they're all stacking computers and running local models. I was just thinking back to how much the first couple of computers I owned cost $4,000 in 1980. And then the prices came down. You could buy a Dell for $500, $800, like really nice laptops for that price. Use the promo code ALLIN. It's not as much as a joke. But do you think there's a world where we're going to start to see the desktop because people want to protect that data. They want to protect the skills they're building. They don't want to give it to Sam Altman, put it in a cloud somewhere. They don't want to give it to Google, whoever it happens to be, and that the desktop revolution comes back and everybody's got a $10,000 desktop. Is that coming? I don't know if everyone will have a $10,000 desktop, but that would be great. I mean, you know, so we have this Dell portal on Hugging Face, and we have all these open models, and we've qualified them on every kind of machine we have. And, you know, there's been enormous progress in the open source models. You know, Google has these Gemma models, G-E-M-M-A, And they work really, really well on small machines. You know, OpenAI has their open source models. You've got the NVIDIA Nemotron models. You've got, you know, enormous ecosystem of open source that is, you know, thriving and certainly OpenClaw. And, you know, there'll be some good discussion about that. How many people have set up OpenClaw? Raise your hand. Oh, my Lord. That's about, what, 20% of the audience here. Yeah, so, you know, autonomous agents, big deal, and certainly inside companies, there's going to be a lot more autonomous agents. There are significant security requirements that need to go with that We need to be able to authenticate and validate who these agents are and what they doing and have the right controls and that sort of thing Yeah. And your take on AGI and when we're going to hit it, do you actually think about superintelligence and AGI and the two sets of problems that could solve there? And do you have a personal definition that you like to use for those when you're talking internally with your team of how things are moving? I don't really know, Jason. And, you know, I think it feels like with the latest releases, we were talking about this backstage, you know, the Gemini 3.1, the Opus 4.6, the OpenAI 5.4. It feels like we sort of hit some kind of threshold where just the quality of the models are just tremendous. And when I listen to what our teams are able to accomplish in a day or two weeks that would have taken them, you know, a few months or nine months time, you know, it's just amazing the speed of innovation. And so it seems to be continuing. And we get all the reinforcement learning. And there's also tons of private dark data that these models haven't been applied to. And that's sort of what's happening with these. I think the auto research is that's the key with auto research, the capacity to take a standard model and then retrain it on your private data and keep it private and build an advantage for your organization based on the history of your data that no one else has. That seems to be what a lot of folks are thinking about that have the capacity. But if you were to start a company today that was not in computing and you were to build a business from the ground up, how would you architect your people and your organizational principles as an AI kind of first knowing what you know about computing and where things are headed? Are you hiring people? Are you hiring a bunch of people to run a bunch of agents? How do you think about architecting a new business today? It's a great question. I don't really spend a lot of time thinking about that. I'm thinking about how do I run it? That's what the rest of us are thinking about. How do I run our company? I mean, that's hard enough. Yeah. Everyone I talk to, that's the question. They're like, everyone goes to these off sites and they're like, I'm actually doing this with my management team on Monday. We're doing like a teardown and be like, hey, how would we build the business differently today? Yeah, I mean, what we've been thinking a lot about is sort of this reimagining question. Yeah. You know, sort of, all right, we know the trajectory of the tools. What are the tools going to be in 27, 28, 29, and how do we accelerate our path to that? How worried are you about social issues? So AI recently ranked as the most unfavorable term of a list of terms, including President Trump. Yeah, I saw that. It was somewhere between ISIS, the Democrats. ICE, ISIS, and the Democrats. ICE was better than AI. People liked mass agents more than they like AI. Yeah. Well, I think part of the problem is it's been maybe sold as – it sort of presents itself like a human would. Yeah. Right? And maybe if we called it linear algebra. Matrix multiplication. Calculus and statistics instead. Right. Matrix multiplier. Maybe that would be more friendly. I don't know. Yeah. But do you think we're going to have – I think you're right. The positioning is wrong, and then we're not communicating to people, hey, this could help health care. This could make you live longer. This could help your kids get educated more. This could help with housing costs. This could help with food costs. Messaging aside, I mean how much do you actually worry about disruption or dislocation in employment, about acceleration of earnings for some people and deceleration for other people in society that feel left behind? And that starts to fuel more of the kind of social concerns and politicians saying, hey, we got to stop building all the data centers, you know, like that kind of stuff. And how much are you really? I tend to be more optimistic. And, you know, I do think that in all technology cycles, you get sort of these network effects. And that's kind of inevitable. But I also think, you know, we're going to do more with the tools. You do have this acceleration of all sorts of great things. I mean, education can dramatically improve scientific discovery, health care, energy, you know, all sort of the unsolved problems can be accelerated. Ultimately, I think it's amplification of human potential and capability. Extending the frontier, too. And by the way, we should also remember that basically what we're talking about here beyond sort of some of the advanced semiconductors in the big data centers, we're talking about software, right? Yeah. Right? It's like software that runs on your computer. So, you know, somebody says, well, we don't want that. It's like, how do you stop total software? How are you going to stop someone putting an open source model on their computer at home and asking it for medical advice? You know, New York just passed a law saying AI models can no longer give medical advice. I don't know that it's passed, right? It's being proposed. Oh, proposed, yes. It's being proposed that you can't give legal and health advice. We're anti-software. Well, also anti-books and advice. So if you were going to look it up in a book. But were you dropping into your Bernie Sanders right there? That was my Bernie Sanders. Michael Dowell, the 1% of the 1% that you're enabling with your data centers, why are you doing this to the people of our great nation? Well, you give your money to children in the Invest America accounts. Yeah. This is a good one you're doing. Yeah. Can we talk about Invest America? I think he might have even criticized that, but, you know. Well, that's the problem. The billionaires are giving our children money, and they're not asking us permission, and then those kids are going to buy things that their parents never asked for. Well, they don't actually get the money until they're 18 years old. So that's. But what gives you the right to give our children an education? What is this philanthropy? It makes no sense. No, I mean, honestly. Well, I see my great friend Brad Gerstner here. Brad's here? There he is. Brad, come up for this little segment here. Sit for a second. Let's talk about a mess of America. We've got five minutes left here. So, you know, I heard about. Everybody in the fifth bestie, give him a round. I know he's going to be here. All right. How did this go down, Michael? I heard about this idea in 2021 from Brad, and I thought, you know, that's just a great idea. That's an awesome idea. And, you know, I think there were some discussions with the prior administration, but they didn't do anything about that, unfortunately. And, you know, here we are, you know, a miracle. You know, the Invest America Act was passed, and, you know, now we have thousands of companies that are joining in and matching the government's contribution. And, you know, Susan and I made a big announcement giving $250 to 25 million children in zip codes where the median income is. I mean, Michael, let's pause for a second here. This is one of the greatest... What do you think, Bernie? Do you approve? I could go with J. Cal. I just want to pause on this because it is one of the greatest philanthropic gifts in the history of humanity. And people have just kind of glossed over to it because there's a lot of big numbers in the world. But we're talking about, you personally, you and Susan, sat down and said, we're going to give a number. And that number was $5, $6, $7 billion. It's $250 to 25 million children ages 2 to 10 in zip codes where the median income is $150,000 or less. It's $6.25 billion. I just want to say something. We live at a time where… But they have to sign up to claim the accounts. Yes. They have accounts, but they have to sign up to claim the accounts. I think we're getting 100,000-plus kids now a day signing up. First, thanks for having me up. I mean, what a national hero and national asset that my friend Michael Dell is. But he understates this because I've been working on this for four years. We've been talking about it on the All In pod. We had a lot of momentum. But behind the scenes, Trump gets elected. and so it's April that we're in the middle of the tariff strife April 25 we realize there's only going to be one piece of legislation that gets passed during Trump's first two years it'll be the you know this big beautiful bill the reconciliation bill and so I call up Michael and I said Michael we got to go we've got five days we have the it's drafted in the Senate we We have bipartisan support, but we have a window. And like I have to get in the Oval Office. We have to get in the Oval Office. And Michael said, what should the text say? And you and I had a conversation and you – The text to DJT. Yes. I'm not talking out of school. Listen, Biden – wherever you sit on the political divide, I will say – I've said this. Trump seeks out ideas from business leaders, and he has deep respect for business leaders like Michael Dell. Wherever your politics are, that's just the truth, and the last administration didn't. And, you know, Bill Clinton may have done the same thing. And I just have to say, Invest America, it's not a red idea or a blue idea. It's a red, white, and blue idea, right? Exactly. So into the prior conversation, while Michael and I first talked about it, you know, it was this is the right thing to do. Right. Like we have to reconnect the 70 percent of people who feel left out and left behind to the American dream. Right. But this isn't our self-interest. This is about defending the ownership society and capitalism that for 250 years created the greatest experiment. in the history of the world, but that's at risk. Less than half people under the age of 40 have a favorable view of capitalism. So when I talked to you about it the first time, Michael understood both sides of it. It's the right thing to do, and it's the right thing for the country. And so at any rate... Michael Dell, tremendous American. I have just one punch up. The name Invest America, Trump accounts. What do you think? Were you considering this in the context of other philanthropy? I mean, how do you kind of put this together in the spectrum of how you think about giving back? Yeah, great question. So we have a foundation that's very focused on children in urban poverty. That's basically the central focus of the foundation, although folks in Central Texas would know that we do a few other things here in our local community. and you know when i've heard about this idea one of my thoughts was wow this is like a platform for directly giving to the people that we're targeting right and you know we actually thought about doing it just in texas first and um you know things have gone pretty well with the company and all that so you know we thought we just go bigger and and what happens brad if you know 10 more michael dells show up and and there are dozens there's not a lot of michael dells let's be honest but there there's a number of folks who could make an equal size or even greater gift um there are people who you know many hands makes for light work there are a thousand people who can make a gift of significance. What if this actually becomes a movement and we change the dialogue? I think it actually is becoming a movement instead of a moment and we've got a lot of that queued up. Wait, have you called anybody, Michael? Did you call me as us and ask them? Michael and I chair the Invest America Giving Committee and we're ambitious guys. We've had a few conversations. You're texting people. Yeah. So just there's a question. First, it's really important to understand and for you guys to spread the word. Every child under the age of 18, every child under the age of 18 is eligible to claim their account. Number one. Number two, you've heard this like, oh, kids born between 25 and 28. No, this is forevermore. The legislation creates this account forevermore. Every child born in America, starting January 1st, 2027, will automatically get a Trump account at birth stapled to their Social Security card. The $1,000 has to be reauthorized every four years. But the accounts don't. So every kid, this is Social Security 2.0. This is the biggest change to the social contract in America in 50 years. 3.7 million kids a year will get an account that can compound as a 401k from birth. And yes, we're going to have a lot of announcements, but it's not just billionaires. It's going to be companies that are donating stock on their IPOs into these accounts. It's going to be wealthy people. It's going to be states. It's going to be moms and dads. It's going to be corporations. And the estimate is over 15 years, we can move $5 trillion into the pockets of families that would have otherwise had zero, $5 trillion. And so to me, the leadership that Michael showed, not only in helping me get the meeting that ultimately got this passed into law, and it does take people. Like those moments either happen or they don't happen. And if they don't happen, there's no law and this doesn't change kids' lives. By the way, two things on this. If this $5 trillion moved through government programs, it would get incinerated. Exactly. That's what we see happen. There's just a million crony structures that take it away and destroy it. So to give it directly into the accounts is the circumstance. The second thing is it makes a lot of sense that you guys can – I'll be the lead. But can we replace Social Security in this country with a defined benefit or defined contribution like this? And eventually everyone has a Trump account or whatever you call it. And we don't have to have this fake Ponzi scheme that we call Social Security. If Australia can do it, we can do it. Well, they have a defined benefit program. But I'm saying like everyone has an account and they all own a piece of their future. And every time you get a payroll to tax deduction, instead of it getting inviscerated and destroyed and vaporized, that money actually goes into an account and you buy a piece of a company and maybe you can direct it. Freberg's getting angry. On July 4th of this year. You're getting me wound up. So there are four and a half million kids who've claimed their account. Almost $150,000 a day will have on the trajectory we're on $10 million by July 4th, our 250th anniversary of the country. every one of those kids accounts the parents and the kids on july 4th they'll see an app on their phone that looks a lot like a robin hood app it'll see them owning it'll say you've received your thousand dollars or your 250 dollars you're and it will show a little bit of nvidia a little bit of walmart a little bit of dell we decompose the s&p 500 which they own into the constituent parts so they can get excited about being an owner in the upside of america and when moms and dads double click and Apple pay five, ten bucks into the account, right? When they send their QR codes to their friends on their birthday, and now their friends all add to the account or on Christmas or bar mitzvahs, and they add to the accounts. When companies add to the accounts, all of this, they see it growing, and it unlocks the human potential. It's not just the money. It's that I'm in the game. I have a shot, which to David's point, I think the biggest crime of Social Security, and we made very clear, Social Security is a sacred promise. We refused, and many people tried to get us to take on the broader struggle, and we didn't do it because we knew it would kill this program. But let's be clear about this. Our government requires all of us to give 10% of what we earn into Social Security. It was the social contract evolution in the Industrial Revolution that kept the country together. The only problem is it goes into a black hole. Nobody sees it. Nobody knows what's there. But it is your savings. Now imagine if that same money was required to – government took it away, but it was in an account with your name on it. You could see it grow. You know exactly what was there. You could get excited and say, hey, I'm going to add a little bit more to that, right? And you had a little bit of choice. That to me is the possibility, and I think we will end up there. And Brad, thank you for – Yeah, let's get it up for Brad. I'm just going to say, you know, Brad also adopted his home state of Indiana. We have Ray and Barbara Dalio adopted their home state of Connecticut and many, many more to come. And look, it's going to be super easy for anybody to add 100 kids in your neighborhood, adopt a zip code, adopt a school district, adopt a town. It's going to be amazing. Give it up for one of the great entrepreneurs of our time and an incredible pledge.

© 2026 GrayBeam Technology Privacy v0.1.0 · ac93850 · 2026-04-03 22:43 UTC