These Accusations Against Trump Will FLOOR You

After facing immense backlash stemming from claims the DOJ was purposely trying to withhold some of the Epstein files to protect Donald Trump, the DOJ has now released the interview with the woman accusing Trump of sexually assaulting her when she was a child. Jenk, we'll get into the details in a second, but first your two cents. >> I'm a little puzzled by this, guys, because um these are terrible allegations, but we covered them before. I guess there's more details now. We'll share the horrific details with you in a second. But why did this come out now? That's super weird. We'll talk about that, too. First, Jordan, give us the facts. >> Sure. >> To bring you up to speed a bit, the allegation was public knowledge thanks to internal FBI documents and a slideshow that was made public in the initial Epstein file dump that showed prominent names listed in the Epstein files. You could see here stated EP blank stated Epstein introduced her to Donald Trump who subsequently forced her head down to his exposed penis which she subsequently bit. In response, Trump punched her in the head and kicked her out. This incident was said to have happened in the 1980s when she when the accuser was between 13 and 15 years old. The agents interviewed the alleged victim four times in 2019 and had written summaries of each conversation. However, NPR's report says only the FBI's first interview with the Trump accuser in which she makes no allegations of wrongdoing against the president was part of the DOJ's massive records release made public last month. According to the New York Times, initially officials said the missing files were quote duplicates that had been released elsewhere. But that wasn't true. So now let's get into what the additional three interviews which took place in August and October of 2019 revealed. In the second interview, the woman described additional abuse by Epstein and several of his male associates. She said that Epstein drove her and or flew her to either New York or New Jersey sometime when she was between 13 and 15 years old and she was taken to a very tall building. It was there that she said Epstein introduced her to Trump. Trump asked everyone to leave the room where they met and mentioned something to the effect of, "Let me teach you how little girls are supposed to be." According to the description of the woman's comments in the interview, he then unzipped his pants and put her head down to his penis. The woman told agents that she bit Trump, who then struck her and said words to the effect of, "Get this little blank the hell out of here." In the woman's third FBI interview about 3 weeks later, agents wrote that she described receiving threatening telephone calls that she said she believed had to do with Epstein or Trump, as well as several incidents where she was almost run off the road by other cars. Up until this point, her attorney had been present during the interviews. However, during the fourth and final one, she was uncomfortable with being recorded and questioned the point of coming forward with these allegations. It's unclear what became of the FBI's investigation into the woman's claims. An email sent between FBI agents last summer and included in the DOJ file notes that one identified victim claimed abuse by Trump but ultimately refused to cooperate. Although it doesn't specify if it's the same person as the accuser. The claims this woman made matched those of Jane Doe for who had sued the Epstein estate but dropped her lawsuit in December of 2021 after receiving a a financial settlement. She did not name Trump in the lawsuit, only stating Epstein brought her to gatherings in New York with prominent wealthy men. Trump has consistently denied wrongdoing in connection with Epstein. In a statement Thursday, White House press secretary Caroline Levit described the claims from the FBI interviews as quote completely baseless accusations backed by zero credible evidence. She also questioned the credibility of the accuser, whose name is redacted in the files, pointing to her criminal record. According to the Miami Herald, she was arrested for theft in the past, but the charges were dropped. There's more to this. We'll get into some of the timing and the other details, but Keith, I want to bring you in here. What do you make of this this new document dump and how how do you think people should see this? Well, it's very clear that there's something going on here. Our government is covering something up at the moment and I would like to know why the Department of Justice isn't further investigating this. I know that Caroline Levit wants to say that these are basic baseless accusations, but I'm telling you right now, the FBI does not interview someone four separate times if they feel like there's no there there. Now, I don't know whether or not Donald Trump did what this accuser said. Now, there's a lot of smoke. We don't know if there's any fire, but a competent DOJ, a competent FBI would investigate this regardless of who the president is. And I want to say one final thing is that it's really interesting to me that Hillary Clinton is being interviewed by Congress. Bill Clinton is being interviewed by Congress. Howard Lutnik is going to be interviewed by Congress. But Donald Trump, who's mentioned, I think 30,000 times, 70,000 times, a lot more times than Hillary Clinton, has not had one interview with Congress. >> Yeah. So guys, when the files first came out, I said there's like order of credibility, right? So when you have emails of Epstein and his friends, those are the most credible because those are clearly emails, things they wrote. So if they admitted to things in the emails, that has a ton of credibility, right? So the second was known accusers. Uh so if they wrote something contemporary contemporaneously at the time, we go, "Oh, okay. Well, that has a good amount of credibility. That's a person we know was a victim and that's what they wrote at the time about how they got victimized." And there's some haunting stories in there. So then there's a third bucket which is what this one was in which is some rando called into the FBI and said this happened. Okay, that's less credible, right? So it hasn't been vetted, etc. That's the category we thought this one was in. That's why it actually when we first heard about it without as many details, we had it in in the camp of I wouldn't I'm not sure we ever said this one on the air. I don't think we did. uh because we thought it wasn't credible enough. But now in this new release, wait, they interviewed her four times. If it's a crank calling in like, "Oh yeah, dude. I knew Trump and he did this." They're not going to go through four interviews, right? So that's interesting. Uh and then Jane Doe number four got a settlement. You don't usually give a settlement to someone who wasn't a victim. So, and she matches Jane Doe number four. Wait a minute. is getting more and more credible as we go, right? Significantly more credible. So now a lot more people are talking about it. Um but I do wonder why did the DOJ of all things and of all times release this now? Did they check with the White House before releasing this? I can't imagine that they did because there's no way Trump would say, "Oh yeah, yeah, go ahead. Put that out about me." how a 13 or 14year-old and this and that and all the things that Jordan just told you. So wait, does somebody at the DOJ release like incredibly damning things about Trump as Trump is trying to make a decision on some things like maybe ground troops or no ground troops in Iran? I don't know. I don't know. It's just like I I know that it sounds like too conspiratorial to connect it to anything else, but it is an incredibly strange time to release this damning information about Donald Trump. Yeah. >> What do you think, Jordan? >> I think the the other angle here is Pam Bondi and the files that were released yesterday is progress, but all of the files should have been released. And according to Thomas Massie, there's still work to be done. >> Not getting the answers we need from Pam Bondi. And um she might be happy to offload this some to somebody else as well because you know I just spent 3 hours at the DOJ this week looking on the computers at the unredacted files and I'm finding evidence of files that they haven't released yet and I'm going to be over there and keep digging on that. But you know they we got them to release 3 million files. There's still a lot more they need to get out. >> It's so shocking to me when they they keep telling us they're all out. Todd Blanch came out. Pam Bondi came and they're not just like don't lie to me. Like I don't like being lied to. That's why Republicans are probably going to lose the House. Pam Bondi will still have to answer for her missteps. It seems on Wednesday, the House Oversight Committee voted to subpoena Bondi for testimony on the DOJ's handling of the Epstein files 24-19. Five Republicans broke with their party and voted with Democrats including Nancy Mace, Tim Berchett, Lauren Boowbert, Michael Cloud, and Scott Perry. In a statement to X, Mace wrote, "We are moving to subpoena US Attorney General Pam Bondi." AG Bondi claims the DOJ has released all of the Epstein files. The record is clear they have not. The Epstein case is one of the greatest cover-ups in American history. His global sex trafficking network is larger than what is being revealed. Three million documents have been released and we still don't have the full truth. Videos are missing. Audio is missing. Logs are missing. There are millions more documents out there. We want to know why the DOJ is more focused on shielding the powerful than delivering justice. The American people deserve answers. Victims deserve justice. Hold the line. According to Mace, the subpoena will be for a closed door testimony with video being released to the public afterwards. There's no date set for when the testimony will occur, but personally, Jen, to your question, I think that's why they did it. It came they released these on the heels of that subpoena. >> Yeah. So, I I hear you. I'm curious what Keith thinks, too. Uh and and others have like one of our members on TYT.com, Mr. Inbetween, wrote, "They released these because even the Republicans in Congress were supporting using a subpoena to get them." So, guys, I I totally get that. At the same time, there's like a million files in there. So, they found the most damaging to Trump and release it out. Maybe, by the way, the other explanation could be it'll get lost in the sauce. Uh, we're in the middle of a war with Iran. We might invade Cuba this weekend, sneak that out there in the middle of a Friday, you know, and hope that it gets buried. So, what do you think, Keith? >> I mean, most of these have been on a Friday dump, so I do think that's part of it. I think they're not I mean these are not these are not very savvy people but they're smart. They're they're doing the smart thing. They're releasing this crazy crap on a Friday. We're still talking about it. But you're right, like there are a lot of different crises happening in our country that I think they're trying to just say, "All right, sweep it under the rug." Um I do think that the subpoena is powerful and I think that's one of the reasons why Pam Bondi has decided that she's going to at least try to follow the law. Uh, I think Christy Gnome kind of getting the axe too is a little bit of a wakeup call to this administration and to the people in it that they're not all powerful, that there is accountability and one way or another, the law is going to catch up to them. And I think Pam Bondi's maybe seeing a little bit of the light on that. >> They never see the light. So I that can't be it. >> It has to be. It has to be the law. The law. >> So look, another one of our members and we like doing the show with you guys. tyt.com/join to be part of the Young Turks. Be a member, be part of the show. Uh and and so let me read one more from TYT.com members. Police at White House says, "I remember when we first found out about Epste being a massive child sex trafficker. We were told that there were a ton of video evidence. Uh why don't we ever hear about the videos anymore?" So, that's such a great point and we covered the videos uh last week, too, and asking the same question as you and we showed you a ton of evidence of why they exist. The New York Times has pictures of the video cameras in the hallways, in the rooms. Uh we know that there's emails that Epstein wrote, "Hey, I'm going to buy more video cameras, put them in the Kleenex uh tissue boxes. There was video cameras found in the clocks." And yet, our government says, "Oh, no. We could not find any of the videos. So where are the videos? So if you think this stuff is damning, you know, whether they wanted to bury it or highlight it today, wait till you get a load of the videos. And look guys, so in terms of blackmail, uh, you know, I made kind of an illusion to it before and people get really touchy about that topic like, "Oh my god, blackmail sounds so conspiratorial." Guys, intelligence agencies use the tactic of blackmail all the time. Not some of the time, not rarely, not like, oh my god, it's a new novel crazy conspiracy. In fact, Israel told uh Clinton back in 1998 as reported by the Israeli press, we have the tapes of you with Monica Lewinsky, so release Jonathan Pard. Okay, so that happened and that was in the middle of the negotiations by the way with the Palestinians. So I don't know what else the Israelis got. So they knew about Monica Lewis before we did, before anyone did and they already used it to blackmail one of our presidents. So where's the videos and who has them and who's going to release them at convenient times or hold them for leverage? Are these fair questions? Obviously, there's definitely videos, and the videos were there for a purpose. There's only one purpose for taping powerful men having illegal sex. It's not complicated. So, there's a lot more to find out here. But so far, what we already know for a lot of these guys and for Donald Trump is disastrous. On the other hand, there's been absolutely no consequences. >> Can I just add one thing before we go to break? So, we talk about like why the timing, right? Of course, it's in the middle of not just a new war in the Middle East, but also on the verge of what is likely to be another regime change operation in Cuba. So, you have two massive foreign policy distractions. And yes, there is some reporting and coverage of these document dumps, but they're hoping you won't notice those because, let's be real, most people don't read print. Some people will tune in to cable news or network news which is largely focused on these foreign policy conflicts right now. But also this all goes back to the monopoly the right is creating within our media and social media. We're seeing a wave of suppression on Tik Tok this week as the Ellison's purportedly are reconfiguring the algorithm to specifically suppress Epstein related videos. I've seen multiple trusted accounts of people have like millions of followers suddenly have their review counts reduced to a couple dozen and some were even suspended. So the suppression is very real. It happens across social media. So it's not just that they they they dump it out there and then they're worried about people finding it. It's that there are other parts of this with their hands on the levers of power making sure you can't even spread it. And I just want to add real quick uh the the government uh that is that is insisting on suppressing the Epstein files is the Kenyan government and the government of Tajikistan. Oh, no. Right. It's weird. Israeli supporters are insisting that the Epstein files be suppressed. H I wonder why. Every time you ring the bell below, an angel gets his wings. Totally not true, but it does keep you updated on our live shows.

President Trump was accused of assaulting a minor, according to new Epstein files released. Cenk Uygur, Jordan Uhl and Keith Edwards discuss on The Young Turks. Do you agree with TYT's take? Tell us what you think in the comments below. SUBSCRIBE today: ☞ https://go.tyt.com/ytsubscribe Get paid to use your phone less! Switch to Noble Mobile today: https://go.tyt.com/mobile 🔥 Tired of corporate media? Get honest news and bold commentary with TYT. 📲 Click Subscribe → https://go.tyt.com/subscribe 🔔 Hit the bell icon so you never miss an episode! 🫶 Love this video? Leave a Super Thanks (💖) and help power our work! 🧢 Grab official merch → https://go.tyt.com/shoptyt ✊ Become a TYT Member for perks & exclusive content → https://go.tyt.com/jointyt Read more here: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/doj-releases-interview-with-woman-who-claimed-trump-assaulted-her-as-a-minor/ "The Justice Department released several FBI documents on Thursday describing interviews with a woman who accused President Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her as a minor. The DOJ previously withheld the release of these documents in their release of over three million pages of documents relating to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Though the president’s name was mentioned thousands of times within the files, reporting from NPR and The Washington Post revealed that many documents were withheld, including those alleging wrongdoing on the part of the president." *** Your Support is Crucial to the Show: https://go.tyt.com/jointoday The largest online progressive news show in the world. Hosted by Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian. LIVE weekdays 6-8 pm ET. http://youtube.com/theyoungturks/live Help support our mission and get perks. Membership protects TYT's independence from corporate ownership and allows us to provide free live shows that speak truth to power for people around the world. See Perks: ▶ https://www.youtube.com/TheYoungTurks/join TYT is the largest online news network in the country. It presents news, context and analysis. We have dozens of on-air hosts on half a dozen major channels on almost all the platforms. We also have a live 24-hour news channel that features all our shows. The Young Turks is the flagship show of the TYT Network. The Young Turks is the longest running daily show in internet history. We’re about to celebrate our 20th anniversary as a digital native show. We are also the first ever YouTube partner channel. So, we are the original YouTubers. Our commentary and perspective are almost always on the left, but we have an enormous range of opinions on the network. Hosts are allowed to think and say whatever they like. Perspectives usually range from the far left to the center of the political spectrum. Now, our presence and range is large enough that we are adopting the tagline The Online News Network. Our longevity, our 27 million subscribers and 30 billion lifetime views allows us to make this claim confidently. TYT emphasizes open-minds and open-hearts. We believe in fighting for the average American. We believe in challenging the powerful. We are vigilant about pursuing the truth to the best of our abilities and for always being honest with our audience. We’ve been proud to serve the internet for longer than any other news show or network. As one of the founding fathers and mothers of online media, we have always believed that digital media would become the dominant news source for all Americans. We’re thrilled that day is here and that TYT is where everyone can come to see The Online News Network. TYT includes owned and operated and partner shows such as The Young Turks, The Damage Report, Indisputable, and more. TYT’s 24/7 programming is available on YouTube TV, Samsung TV, Plus, Roku, Xumo, TCLtv+, Fubo, and more. TYT is also available as a podcast on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, TuneIn, Amazon Music, and more. SUBSCRIBE on YOUTUBE: ☞ http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=theyoungturks FACEBOOK: ☞ http://www.facebook.com/TheYoungTurks TWITTER: ☞ http://www.twitter.com/TheYoungTurks INSTAGRAM: ☞ http://www.instagram.com/TheYoungTurks TWITCH: ☞ http://www.twitch.com/tyt 👕 Merch: http://shoptyt.com ❤ Donate: http://www.tyt.com/go 🔗 Website: https://www.tyt.com If you want to watch more videos from TYT, consider subscribing to other channels in our network: The Watchlist https://www.youtube.com/watchlisttyt Indisputable with Dr. Rashad Richey https://www.youtube.com/indisputabletyt The Damage Report ▶ https://www.youtube.com/thedamagereport TYT Sports ▶ https://www.youtube.com/tytsports The Conversation ▶ https://www.youtube.com/tytconversation Rebel HQ ▶ https://www.youtube.com/rebelhq TYT Investigates ▶ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwNJt9PYyN1uyw2XhNIQMMA #TYT #TheYoungTurks #BreakingNews 260306__TB01DOJInterview