SAVANNAH STONE - the FEMALE ANDREW TATE!

Consent doesn't exist in marriage. I know this is going to piss a lot of people off, but when you get married, your body belongs to your husband, and your husband's body belongs to you. To become one, body, mind, soul, and spirit. Okay, hear me out. It is a Thursday at 11:00 a.m. I'm in all Lululemon. I went to the gym this morning. Then I went to pick up my raw milk, went to my favorite coffee shop, got my latte, came to the grocery store, got steaks and ingredients for tonight's dinner because we're hosting. Now I'm going to go drop off some closet alterations, maybe help my husband with accounting and tax stuff, clean the house again because we're hosting, so I'm going to do a deep clean. You do have to find the right man who gives you the option to do this. But imagine how much propaganda it took to convince women that this is oppressive. To the single and toxic women in my comments who wish divorce upon me, that's never happening. Because here are some things I did to save my marriage before it even started. Number one, we literally took a test called Save Your Marriage Before It Starts. It's Simbus. And I'm 95% sure that this has to be authorized through a professional or a psychologist of some sort. My second claim is that men and women are not equal and should not be treated as such. Well, then why is your man posting online like he got only fans? I am so tired of the utter obsession with politics. The obsession of expecting every single influencer to speak up about every single political issue that is happening in the United States. I mean, every single comment section on my post and other influencers posts who don't even really talk about politics, by the way, is please speak up on ICE. Please speak about this. What are your thoughts on this? Man, I'm really disappointed that you haven't spoken up about this. What if I don't care? >> Feminism was never a good thing. People will say, you know, the first wave of feminism was great. Like, it gave women the right to vote and it gave women the right to work. I don't want to do any of that. >> Honestly, feminism is supposed to be pro- women, but I feel like feminism actually against women. >> Yeah. It doesn't empower them. It confuses them. >> This little cookie here is making quite the stir on the Tik Tok lately. Her name is Savannah. She is giving marriage advice from what seems to be a lavender marriage. >> You know that specific kind of internet personality that seems to materialize overnight, fully convinced that they've cracked the code to life, even though they've barely had time to live any of it. That's the lane savannah faith stone step into. She's 20 years old. She got married at 18. She doesn't have any kids. She didn't go to university. And her full-time job is telling other women how they should be living. >> These are some things you need to hear. Number one, a good man would rather marry a grocery store clerk who makes $14 an hour, but is super feminine, wants to serve him, love him, loves to cook, loves to do all the wife qualities and wants to have a family rather than a millionaire boss babe who only cares about work and being independent. Number two, if you expect a man to be taller than you and make more money than you, don't get upset when he wants you to be younger than him and have a low body count. Number three, even though the world doesn't praise you as much for it, it is a much bigger accomplishment to find the love of your life young, to have a bunch of kids, to have a happy and healthy home, and to raise a nuclear family than it ever will be to achieve a certain title at work or start a business. Number four, feminism is the complete opposite of empowering. Of the sex industry, killing your babies because it's inconvenient, all damage you more than anybody else. It damages women more than anybody else in this society. So, how is that empowering to women? And lastly, it's going to be more beneficial for you long term to work on skills like cooking from scratch, baking, reading literature, painting, doing feminine hobbies than it is to go get a degree. Isn't it so crazy that feminism does the exact opposite of empowering women? It is not giving you freedom. It is actually silencing you. It has convinced women that sexualization is freedom, that selling their bodies online is freedom, that having multiple partners is freedom. But what this actually does is exploit you and enslave you. It's funny how feminism actually just gave the worst type of men exactly what they wanted. I mean, having as much emotionless sex as possible, only fans, running around half naked, killing their babies, men and women's sports. How does that equal female empowerment? Not to mention, you're warding off all of the good men. I mean, you guys say over and over how much you hate men when you are literally doing the things that please the worst type of men. If you were focused more on traditional femininity, on having one partner, on getting married, on having kids, on building a family unit, I promise you would attract really good men into your life and therefore you wouldn't hate all men. And every time I say things like this, I get told that I'm tearing down other women. No. The reason that I post what I post is because I actually care about other women and their well-being. You can take it or leave it. But if I were to just let you exploit yourself and enslave yourself to what I would consider a cult, I mean, take Bonnie Blue for example, that would be me not caring about you. And somehow in under a year, she's pulled in over 300,000 followers across different platforms. She did this not by sharing a long life journey or deep expertise, but by positioning herself as someone who understands womanhood, who understands marriage and what she believes is wrong with modern women better than most. Depending on who you ask, Savannah is either a breath of fresh air. Are you guys okay? No, really, because everybody is going after Savannah Stone. Savannah Stone is a young modern tradife. She recently went viral for basically saying that there is implied consent in a marriage. She was going over the boundaries and the rules of her marriage. But everybody is attacking this girl so personally. They're going after her age. They're saying that her man is a groomer because he's just a few years older than her. They're saying that she is teaching younger girls and exhibiting cultlike behavior because she's a trad wife and because she looks good doing it. And that's really what it is. The people who are claiming that they're feminists are going after this girl so hard when really all you guys are just mad that you can't get over the fact that women can be happy and thrive as a traditional housewife or mother and look good doing it >> or a walking red flag. >> The advice that I want to give you today is that please don't listen to the young 20-year-olds romanticizing being a stay-at-home wife. Okay? We did not come this far to go back like a million steps. Okay, there is a reason why education and financial literacy and independence has been shoved down our throats by our moms and our grandmothers. Because if being a stay-at-home wife, okay, and a mother was that incredible and had no risks, then more women would be doing it, right? Would we be working multiple jobs and trying to make ends meet? No, we wouldn't be. Okay. So, let's listen to the 40-year-old, 50-year-old, 60-year-old women who have lived before us, who have experienced life to tell us what to do with our money and what to do with our independence. Okay. Some people see her as a return to tradition in a way that feels chaotic and unstable. Others see her as another young conservative woman who clots that there is serious money in shaming women into submission, especially when you package it as confidence and certainty. When it comes to Savannah, she does not soften her message. According to her, feminism is poison and a wife's body belongs to her husband. >> Feminism was never a good thing. People will say, you know, the first wave of feminism was great. Like, it gave women the right to vote and it gave women the right to work. I don't want to do any of that. >> Honestly, feminism is supposed to be pro- women, but I feel like feminism actually against women. >> Yeah. It doesn't empower them. It confuses them. Well, and most of the ones that I've met that I know that I've talked to, they're miserable. >> Yes, >> that's just the truth. They're really miserable after a certain age, especially uh when they're in their prime, they think they have all the time in the world, they uh slow play their cards and then by the time they hit 30, they realize that, holy, what am I doing with my life? Usually, it's very hard for them to get married. >> Correct. >> Why is that? >> Well, I mean, it's it's what society pushes, right? Like you graduate high school, you've got to go get a college degree. And you can't get married until you have that college degree. That's what my parents told me growing up, by the way, was really you have to get your college degree before you get married. So society teaches that to women, like, okay, well, you have to use your 20s and use your teens to accomplish as much as possible. And children are an inconvenience, and marriage is an inconvenience because it stops you from being as productive as possible. Society wants to utilize women. They don't want them to actually live out their purpose is the problem. So feminism has has pushed so much propaganda that it's made women believe that and now they're getting into their 30s, late 30s, almost 40s, and they're like, "Oh, I'm not married. I don't have kids. All that I have to my name is some degree. It's temporary." Or some job title, whatever it may be. And then they end up miserable. And they look at all these young women and they're like, "Damn, I wish I would have just gotten married." >> Consent, she implies, didn't really apply in marriage before modern culture ruined everything. Men, if you get off to any other woman other than your wife, you are committing adultery. Number two, consent doesn't exist in marriage. I know this is going to piss a lot of people off, but when you get married, your body belongs to your husband and your husband's body belongs to you. To become one, body, mind, soul, and spirit. She has also claimed that gay people do not contribute anything to society, which falls apart the moment you look around at literally any workplace, any hospital, any school, or any creative industry. Gay people are everywhere because they are part of everyone. Gay people are parents, they are teachers, they are doctors, they are artists, they are scientists, they are business owners and they are even YouTubers like me. Their contributions are not optional add-ons. They are woven into how society functions. Because if gay people literally added nothing to the society, then HMRC should not send me any letter through the letter box asking me to pay my taxes. Their contributions aren't optional add-ons. They are woven into how society functions. What makes Savannah effective is how she delivers all of this. Most of the time, she's in front of the camera doing her makeup or like maybe doing skincare and just speaking. And when she speaks, she speaks like she's reading from a rule book that the rest of us were just too brainwashed to find. I don't know who needs to hear this, but if you're the type of woman that's like, I love when a man tells me to be ready by 7:30. He tells me when he's going to pick me up, tells me where we're going, tells me what to wear, plans the entire date, pays for the date, but then when he tells you to cut off a friend, that's not good for you. You say, "You're not allowed to tell me what to do." Then you don't actually want true masculine leadership. You want leadership when it benefits you and what you want in the like these aren't opinions. These are facts that everybody else is just too scared to accept. Her entire brand just rest on one central idea, and that idea is that submission equals freedom, and that traditional gender roles aren't restrictive. They are natural. >> Okay, hear me out. It is a Thursday at 11:00 a.m. I'm in all Lululemon. I went to the gym this morning. Then I went to pick up my raw milk, went to my favorite coffee shop, got my latte, came to the grocery store, got steaks and ingredients for tonight's dinner because we're hosting now. Now, I'm going to go drop off some clothes at alterations, maybe help my husband with accounting and tax stuff, clean the house again, cuz we're hosting. So, I'm going to do a deep clean. You do have to find the right man who gives you the option to do this. But imagine how much propaganda it took to convince women that this is oppressive. So, you're saying as a married woman, I should be willing to give up my career for my family, learn how to make food from scratch, be submissive to my husband, have one bank account, no prenup, and be trapped for life in one relationship. Yeah, that would be a healthy marriage. And when it comes to Sabana's marriage, her marriage is constantly on display. And her marriage is meant to be proof that her life is going perfectly. For example, she could be like, "Look at my life. This is what success looks like. Because I've done it right, I've got to tell you how to live. >> No one can tell me that there's anything better than this. Pink fluffy robe on, ninja creamy, my water, ring on my finger, and look what I'm watching." And then things get messy because the internet inevitably became obsessed with her marriage, specifically with her husband, Noah, and more specifically with the rumor that Noah Stone might be gay. >> You're a stay-at-home wife because he knows that if he took you out, you were here all day. >> People talk about it so much that it hangs over everything she posts. The term lavender marriage keeps popping up. And the term lavender marriage is a phrase that historically has been used for marriages that existed to hide someone's sexuality. And this cuts straight to the heart of Savannah's entire platform because even her fellow conservative people actually think that her marriage is a lavender marriage. >> Well, but every single thing you say is literally appealing to men and usually hating on women as well, which is funny cuz I would think if I was in a happy marriage, I wouldn't even do this. like I would just go out and just be happy and do my thing. I think the advice you give to women is awful. I think it's at a detriment to them and I don't think it comes from true happiness and I think it really does come out of insecurity from being in frankly a lavender marriage as everyone online can see. >> The beautiful Annie Twinkle even said that her husband looks just like Woody from Toy Story. >> I have somebody who literally looks just like Woody. Somebody is 18, might be a little redwing, a little Trump supporter, not my camera focusing on him. So, today we're talking about female Andrew Tate. So, she comes on the internet and she has the most painful takes for somebody who's newly read. She is 18 years old. Yes, you heard me right. She's 18. Her man, it's not, you know, 65 Thor, the guy from Titanic. He's actually in the room with me right now. Oh my god. Woody. Her fiance is Woody. You know, usually I'm a jester and I like to make jokes. She's made it so easy for me to shoot this video. You don't understand. >> Denial is a river in Egypt. YOUR HUSBAND is >> gay. But with all due respect, Woody should not be disrespected or stood solo to that level of mediocrity. Okay, thank you. I still love you, girl. But anyways, her authority comes from the idea that her marriage is the blueprint, that her life is the evidence, that she isn't just talking theory, that she's living the outcome that she's selling. So, when that marriage is questioned, the whole structure just starts to wobble. This is why the rumors won't die. Because if the marriage isn't what it's presented as, then the moral certainty, the rigid rules, the lectures aimed at millions of women, all start to look less like wisdom and more like a performance. So that's what this deep dive is about. Not just who Savannah Stone is, but how she works, what she believes, how her content fits neatly into a wider ecosystem of conservative ragebait. Why the lavender marriage speculation will never go away, and how her husband's image has become inseparable from her brand. She exists in a space where strict moral codes and personal contradictions constantly collide. A space where hypocrisy doesn't sink you, it often makes you richer. And when you zoom out far enough, you start to notice something unsettling. This is a very young person who turned pointing out what women are supposedly doing wrong into a business model. And it leaves you wondering how much of what we consume online is real. How much of what we consume online is created? And how often certainty is just confidence that has been wrapped around very little lived experiences. But that being said, let me introduce my beautiful self, okay? because I slay. Okay. Hi guys, my name is Joel and welcome to my channel. On this channel, I speak about whatever I want to speak about, whether trendy or not. I do deep dives, social commentary, video essays. Literally, I speak about what I want to speak about. Okay, but that being said, if you like me, you want to see me next week, kindly like, share, and subscribe if you care. And I do hope you care. Please, thank you. Share this video. My goal for this year is to be having like nothing less than six numbers in my views. Like nothing less than when I say six numbers like nothing less than like 500k per video. I know it can be done. People do it and I know I can do it too. Okay, but that being said, let's just get straight into this video because we have a lot to talk about today. So getting into this video, let's talk about Sabana Stone because who is Sabana Stone? Savannah Faith Stone is a Florida based tradife influencer who went from being almost invisible online to one of the most talked about young conservative people in less than a year. She's often described as a stay-at-home wife even though she's clearly running a full-time social media presence with hundreds of thousands of followers watching her every move. Her growth due to desperation and the need to be picked by the red pill community, especially Andrew Tate and his miserable brother Tristan, really kicked off in spring 2025. Within a couple of months, she passed 200,000 followers across all platforms. Tik Tok is where things just exploded fasted with over 230,000 followers and millions of likes. Instagram followed closely behind. At one point, her account jumped from around 10,000 followers to nearly 150,000 followers in a single month. That kind of growth doesn't happen randomly. It's the result of saying exactly the kind of things that spark strong reactions. A lot of her content revolves around marriage, femininity, and what she calls a biblical worldview. She frames herself as a submissive Christian wife, and she uses that identity to openly reject feminism. She's very clear about her values. She did not go to college. She does not have any traditional career. She has no interest in what she sees as modern feminist ideals. She presents her lifestyle not just as a choice, but as the correct path. There's been a lot of confusion online about her relationship timeline, so it's worth being somewhat precise. Savannah met her now husband when she was 17 and he was 20, and they knew each other for roughly 1 to two years before getting married. My husband and I recently just celebrated our 1year wedding anniversary, and I'm 19. So, I thought it would be fun to share how and why I got married at 18. For some reason in today's society, it is just a very hard concept for everybody to grasp. Noah and I met in 2022, and I am just somebody who has always told myself that I date to marry. I've really never had like a relationship where I'm just dating the person for fun. I've just always had that mindset around dating that if I'm going to date somebody and give them literally all of my time and attention, then I want to see if there's somebody I'm going to marry. I just think it's really a waste of time to go on dates, to get ready, to text people 247 when you could be doing so many other things. So, it's like I'm not just going to give a rando all my time and attention. So, I have shared this before, but the day that Noah and I met in person, we had maybe been like talking over Instagram for like a week, but then we decided to actually meet in person pretty quickly after that. The second that I saw that man, the Holy Spirit or whatever you want to call it, just in my head was like, "That's your husband." And I immediately was terrified because I was 17 meeting this man. She was around 19 when she went viral for her TR wife content in early 2025. The relationship is often described as a whirlwind, not because they married immediately after meeting, but because once they got engaged, they got married just 3 days later. >> Engaged, married in 3 days. Let's chat about it, shall we? The three questions that I get asked most often about my wedding story is, "Why do you not have any engagement photos up? Why do you not have any wedding photos up? And why do you not have a wedding band?" And the truth is is just because we did everything so quickly. And truthfully, I do not regret it one bit. It was so spontaneous. It was so unexpected that I was actually able to be really, really present in the moment. I wasn't thinking about all the details that you have to think about when you're throwing a big wedding. I wasn't thinking about how other people felt because obviously we didn't have a huge guest list and we saved a lot of money. So Noah and I knew very early on that we wanted to get married. I mean it was just very obvious. We have the same values, same beliefs. I became a better person very very quickly because of him and vice versa. I believe so. When it came to the time that we were talking about moving to another city and getting married, we took the Simbas test which I have another video where I kind of talked about this but I can do another in-depth one as well. It's called Save Your Marriage Before It Starts. It showed that we were 100% compatible. It showed us everything that we would struggle with in marriage, everything we would argue about. So, we really went into our marriage being very, very prepared. We were like, "Okay, if we're going to get married this young, we have to beat the statistics. We are in it to win it. We're committed to each other 100% and we're going to do life together." On our dream apartment and everything, but the date that we had to move into the apartment was earlier than we had talked about moving and getting married. And because of our faith, we said that we were not going to move in together before marriage. I also think that that causes a lot of damage to our relationship. So, even though I knew the time frame, the proposal ended up being a complete surprise. It was beautiful. It was everything I could have ever hoped for. And as we're driving back from the proposal, Noah's like, "Oh, by the way, we're getting married on Saturday. I have everything set up." Like, he had contacted the pastor. He had contacted our families. He made sure everybody could be there. It was very intimate. It was just my parents, his parents, our siblings, and a few close friends. Literally, overnight shipped a dress from Princess Polly. It was just a strapless white dress. Nothing crazy, nothing fancy. I actually had to work that day. I was doing professional makeup at the time and I had like six clients that morning. So, I had to do makeup for six clients and then go straight to the church to get married. I ended up getting changed at work and everything. Came to work with the full glam. We actually had a hair stylist in house that day and so she did my hair. Thank god she had like one extra spot. She did my hair for me. And like I said in the beginning, it was really fun because it was so spontaneous that I didn't really have time to be stressed about all the details. I was like, I'm getting married. This is going to be the best thing ever and whatever about the little details. Obviously, I didn't have much to plan. Like, Noah did it all for me. I just had to show up. So, got married that Saturday. It was a beautiful ceremony. It was perfect. It was intimate and I was able to be 100% present at the ceremony. And the next day on Sunday, my mom had actually had an engagement party for us planned. So, she invited I think it was like 40 to 50 people and she rented out the outside area in a restaurant on the coast. It was beautiful. And everyone that wasn't at the ceremony the day before when we got married thought that we were just engaged. And at that engagement party, my dad actually announced in a speech that we were actually married. It was really, really sweet. It almost felt like it was a reception from the day before. And it's really funny cuz I will still get messages and comments sometimes from people being like, "Oh my gosh, you're married. I thought you were just engaged." Because there's not any wedding photos. Will we do some sort of bridal looking shoot at some point? Most likely. Will I get a wedding band at some point? Most likely. I've honestly just been struggling to find one and I kind of want to get it while we're on a trip or something or when we do our honeymoon cuz we haven't done that yet either. Just so it makes it even more memorable rather than just going to like a local jewelry store and getting one. Yeah, that is my engaged to married in 3 days story. If you are thinking about doing something unconventional or untraditional like this, but you're scared of what people will think or you're just scared in general to take that kind of jump, trust me, it was so so worth it. I don't regret it at all. and wouldn't change it for the world and it makes for a really good story. >> According to her, after she went on her first date to her husband, when she got home, she had a conviction from the Holy Spirit that he was her husband. So, she messaged him and she said that she has this feeling that he's her husband. And guess what? He did not push back at all. So, flash forward a little bit, we had maybe gone on like one or two more dates. And then I sent him an audio message 2 weeks after we met. And it was late at night, but I had just been like up thinking about everything. And I told him that I knew that he was going to be my husband. And I sent that in an audio message. And when he responded the next morning, he did not get scared or run away like most beta men would do. So then I was like, okay, this is going somewhere. Do not worry again because we're all going to see why this is very relevant to this story later on. Savannah herself has talked about how different her worldview used to be. She said that in high school she identified as a feminist before shifting towards a traditional stay at home lifestyle with her husband. That contrast is a big part of her appeal. She positions herself as someone who seen both sides and deliberately chose this one. The way she speaks is a big part of why she draws so much attention. She comes across as someone that is certain or some people may even say that she's calm and she has this deep conviction that her choices are guided by clarity and purpose. She frames her beliefs as rooted in kindness, fairness, and truth. Even when those beliefs spark intense backlash from her perspective, she's not being cruel or extreme. She's just being honest. Her reach isn't limited to Tik Tok either. She's appeared on major right-wing podcasts like Fresh and Fit, um the Whatever podcast, and other shows that been tied to the Daily Wire ecosystem. Those appearances helped push her further into the spotlight and also solidified her role as one of the most visible young voices in the trader ecosystem or online space that we have right now. Now, let's speak about how she went from this liberal thing to a cultural war lightning rod. Savana Fate Stone says that she used to identify as a liberal feminist until she was around 16 years old. Anyway, this was back in 2020 when the pandemic was in full swing. The Black Lives Matter protests were everywhere and the internet felt like one long collective panic attack. According to her, watching the media and the government during that time completely shattered her trust and flipped her world view overnight. She had said that she felt lied to, controlled and pushed, which in her telling became the origin story for her heart turned to the right. Girl, lied to you about what exactly? Lie to you about what exactly? The fact that black people get brutalized by the police. The fact that black people are not given the same amount of fairness as people from other races. Lie to you about what exactly? But before the childife persona entered the chat, her plans looked different. She had talked openly about wanting to go to law school and also build a professional career. She competed in Miss Florida USA and place second runner up which suggests someone who was very ambitious in life, someone who wanted visibility and someone who wanted a future that was built around public achievement. But according to our beloved Savannah, she's happy she did not win because she wouldn't had married her beloved price of a husband. So within like less than 6 months then we met. We were already talking about marriage and we just both knew that that's what we wanted and that we checked all of the boxes for each other and I was competing in Miss Florida USA at the time. So he went to that pageant with me and I was kind of like okay whatever happens with this pageant like if I were to win obviously I can't get married. You can't get married as a title holder or I guess or I guess you can't be married as a title holder. I don't know. But I just knew that that wasn't going to happen if I had won that title. And I ended up placing second runner up in that pageant. And then that's when we started conspiring like, okay, we want to move to this bigger city. We want to get married. Here's the plan. Like here's the goal. How are we going to get there? We're both very young. I was obviously legally had to live with my parents at the time. And then he was also living with his parents. So honestly, just after a lot of prayer and hard work, the door did open for us to move over there. And we are both Christians. So it was always in our head like okay either we are getting married before we move over there or we're getting married here planning out a huge wedding and then moving there afterwards. An opportunity did arise pretty much this time last year. It was a couple weeks before this time last year in February where I had to move over there like very quick. like I got the opportunity and then two weeks later I had to be over there >> because shortly after turning 18 she got married and that entire trajectory was quietly shut down. In hindsight that earlier version of her life is now framed as a mistake that she narrowly escaped as if law school and pageantss were a temporary last in judgment rather than years of interest and effort. Her viral moment was not the result of a carefully plotted ideological campaign. It came from a get ready with me video. She casually mentioned that she got married young. The comment section immediately combusted. People were shocked. People were confused. People were critical and fascinated and they were not silent about it. They were like literally very loud. Instead of pulling back or questioning whether this was spiraling, she recognized the moment for what it was and according to her this was attention. She had said herself that once she saw how intense the reaction was, she decided to keep posting about it. From there, the escalation was fast and it was dramatic. Feminism was no longer something she disagreed with. It became a CIA sup. Women should not have the right to vote. Consent does not apply in marriage. All of this was delivered with this calm confidence of someone explaining basic math, not extremely controversial social positions. When people started calling her the female Andrew Tate, she did not rush to correct them. She leaned into it. She appears in clips where Andutate is praised and referenced and she allows the comparison to just do exactly what it is meant to do. I mean her and her husband literally they wind down by watching Andrew Tate. Okay. Whenever she's pray she allows the comparison to do exactly what it's supposed to do, which is to keep her name circulating. If you spend enough time watching her content, a pattern becomes impossible to ignore. She repeats the same talking points again and again. The language stays the same. The framing never shifts and the conclusions are locked in. This is not a belief system that develops over time. It is a script. According to her, feminism is poison and feminism is the number one thing that making society sick. According to her, feminism was designed to control women and to destroy families and also force women into the workforce so that households can be taxed twice. >> I don't think the feminist movement supports women at all. I think it actually harms them. It's told us that sexual exploitation is empowering and that we should kill our offspring if it's an inconvenience to our life and that marriage and family are not important anymore. I mean, it's completely destroyed everything that's been unique about women. >> So, the alternative is like, let me get my ass beat, take my Xanax, and raise these kids when I don't want to. Like, what's the alternative for women who don't aren't happy at home? Like, that's what I don't >> Women are pill popping more now than they were in the 50s. They're more depressed than they were. Yes. Yes. This is completely >> And men are four times Women Yes. two times more likely to be on anti-depressants than men. Men are four times more likely to kill themselves. >> Why do you think that we're more likely to be on anti-depressants? >> Uh, capitalism, the way the world is, the economy, I'll tell you right now, the economy controls the mood of a country. >> You're a slave to the corporate industry and you're a slave to the government because you're paying taxes to the government off literally working a desk job. And that that's not every single woman, but I'm talking about a certain amount. But I'm like, why aren't these comments on women who are in corporate who are literally having to work 40 hours a week? They don't even get much maternity leave. >> Like I'm like, you have to go back to They have to go back to work like what 6 to 8 weeks after giving birth or something like that. That's insane. That's a slave. You're a slave to You're always going to be a slave to something, right? Like I'm I would say like I'm a slave to God. Like I submit to God and that's who controls my life. But if you're working like that, then you're a slave to your boss. I'm definitely not a slave to my husband. I have more freedom at home than I would in a cubicle. >> Yeah. It's just reframing what you think is is defi like I guess redefining slave. It's like it's like this concept around like sacrifice, right? People think that you're sacrificing one thing for another, but then they're disregarding that the alternative has sacrifice. Everything has sacrifice. Absolutely. >> And so like I just love the way you frame it so simply. It's like working on an Excel spreadsheet and having an unpaid lunch break. You think that is better than making my husband, the person that I love, dinner after a hard day of work? Like, >> well, that's the feminist propaganda that we've been told that your career is somehow this this sort of freedom. And unless you're an entrepreneur or self-employed really, like you're you're you're you're in the same predicament pretty much. You've got a boss and you have to report to him. Um, and so it's just it's just funny when I get comments like that saying that I'm a slave to my husband or something and they're at work in a cubicle and they can't leave until 5. I literally so whenever I was uh I think I was like 17 or 18. It was when my husband and I first started dating, I thought I wanted to be a lawyer. Oh my gosh. And so I worked at a law firm. I did an internship at a law firm and I was also a makeup artist at the same time. So I was working so much. I had this internship from 8:00 to 5:00 at a law firm. I had to clock out for my lunch break. I thought it was the dumbest thing ever. I'm like, I'm eating for like 30 minutes and I have to clock out for my lunch break. And so I think about that and I'm like, I had to wake up early. I had to get up at like 6:00 a.m. go to work, type on my computer and like send like print out stuff and go run and get coffee for lawyers and then clock out for my lunch break. I'm like this is slavery. This is modern day slavery. Um, so that's why I brought that up cuz that's I literally that was my job for a while. >> The delivery is smooth, confident, and completely uninterested in complication. There is no space in her worldview of the idea that feminism includes multiple movements or that it has achieved anything concrete. Everything is flattened into its most extreme version. Any nuance that tries to enter the conversation is immediately escorted out. She also leans heavily on what she calls the female happiness paradox. According to her, women have more freedom now, but yet reports being less happy. I am genuinely so embarrassed by American women right now. I don't I don't even know what to say. Um, you guys are not oppressed. American women are not oppressed. We are the most free women in the entire world. And for you guys to come on Tik Tok and Instagram and cry and throw temper tantrums. I I just know these other countries are watching you just like truly astounded and embarrassed for you. From this she draws a very tidy conclusion. Married mothers are the happiest women alive. Single mothers who prioritize careers are miserable, medicated and killing themselves at higher rates. These claims are delivered with absolute certainty and very little interest in context, evidence, or the inconvenient reality that human lives tend to be more complex than a viral talking. Yo, we're going to talk into this because we even have studies that we're going to talk about and I'm going to dismantle this girl's thinking and rhetoric in real time. But let's continue. Her views on marriage follow the same rigid structure. The husband lead, the wife follows. She does not describe this as restrictive. She calls it freedom and trust. She has said that a husband is always right. Even when he is wrong, it is still his role to decide what happens next. And her role is to support that decision. For people who watch her, this is framed as peace and clarity. But for everyone else, it sounds like opting out of autonomy and calling it enlightenment. One of her biggest controversies came when she said that consent does not exist in marriage. Her reasoning was that once people are married, their bodies belong to each other. Many people immediately pointed out that this sounds uncomfortably close to excusing marital rape. She later attempted to clarify, saying that she only meant healthy biblical marriages and that people misunderstood her. >> Consent doesn't exist in marriage. Elaborate on that. >> I bring that I'm laughing about it because that's what I'm getting backlash for now. Um, and I refuse to take down any of my videos that get backlashed because I said what I said and I said it and I'm not going to take anything back. I did further elaborate on TikTok, of course, because that's where I got the most backlash for it. >> Mhm. >> That phrase set a lot of people off. Could I have elaborated on it in the video? Yes, absolutely. I could have elaborated. I knew it was going to cause backlash. Did I think it was going to be this bad? No. But I I said that because there's there's a verse in it's 1 Corinthians 7 3-5 or something and it talks about how when you get married the husband's body belongs to the wife and the wife's body belongs to the husband. Everything I say is coming from a healthy biblical marriage where the husband is a loving husband and the wife is a submissive and respectful wife. And when I say the phrase okay when when you get married you give up your conjugal rights. It also says that in I think verse three or four. The husband gives up his conjugal rights to the wife. The wife gives gives up her conjugal rights to the husband. That word pretty much means consent in today's day and age. >> But if you want to go by the Bible, the Bible has excused people being raped. Okay, let's talk about, okay, I don't even want to go down that rabbit hole. I'm going to give you one example. Remember when Lot wanted to offer up his virgin daughters to be raped because he hid a group of people who were even visitors in his house. And when the village tax people came to his house and they found out, he was like, "Oh, I can give you my daughters to be raped." Unprovoked. Unprovoked. Okay, let's clock that tea. So, that being said, unfortunately, the original statement that she said landed exactly how it sounded the very first time. She has also said that divorce would never be an option for her under any circumstances. Even repeated infidelity would not justify leaving her man. Number three, we do not throw the word divorce around at all. Not even to joke. Ending a lifelong covenant is really not something to joke about. So that word is just not in our vocabulary. >> If a man cheated on you, you would tolerate >> not any my husband. If it was a boyfriend, I'd leave. >> No. Like you're I know you're a man. Like you're a husband. If he cheated on you, you would tolerate it? >> It would be extremely hard to get through. I think that that would be probably the hardest thing I went through in my marriage. But I don't believe in ending a marriage. What if it was reoccurring infidelity? >> I mean, we'd have we'd have an issue there. Like, but yeah, I I wouldn't leave my husband. >> Even if he did it mult multiple times, I wouldn't leave my husband. >> I think women should fold laundry. >> Wow. So many people hear a very belief system that traps women in unsafe situation. People who support her, they hear loyalty and commitment. But one thing we should know is that these are same word but have wildly different implications. Her views on the LGBTQ plus people are just as uncompromising. She had said that being gay is a sin against God and is very unnatural. If it's very unnatural, oh my god, I would not see my girlfriend and every time I want to tear her up. Okay. Okay. Um she has also argued that gay people do not contribute real value to society because they cannot produce biological children. She claims that same-sex marriages are simply legal contracts, not real marriages. These statements have only intensified scrutiny, especially given the ongoing speculation around her own marriage, which she continues to avoid addressing directly. Then there is her stance on women and voting. This is another Pearl Davis. Honestly speaking, she has openly said that she believes that women should not have the right to vote. She has stated that the 19th amendment should be repealed. She has suggested that married men should receive two votes. She has blamed single women voters for Republican losing in 2020. And she's argued that women participating in politics destabilizes society altogether. >> Um I mean I so I personally don't think women should vote and that's probably going to be a very far opinion and that's not to get male validation. That's simply like I I many married women because it would just be like my husband having another vote. But you know during like the suffragist movement they they sold this to women as oh well now you can vote differently than your husband. So now you have choice. And so if we're going to erase women's choice as in you know going on only fans or working or whatever it may be then you you you have to repeal the 19th too. I mean I just don't that we're losing elections. who lost in uh what was it 2020 because women single women were voting. Uh so I think that that's a problem. >> I thought it was the ballot dropboxes. But it's a fair point. I mean there were plenty of women during the the suffrage >> voter ID. But it's like also didn't you vote didn't you vote for Trump? >> Well my Yeah, but it was like my husband had another vote. I'm not voting against my husband. >> If I was voting against my husband, that would be a problem. >> I don't think couples should be voting against each other. I And I think the man should be the head of the household. So I I can see that element of it for sure. So now let's speak about her husband. Her husband's name is Noah Stone. And Noah Stone is not just some guy standing off to the side of Savannah's content. He is the backbone of this entire ridiculous performance. He is the proof that she points to when she says that her version of marriage works in real life. Without him, the whole thing starts wobbling immediately. Savannah presents Noah as the ultimate provider. He's framed as the man who runs the household, who works over 70 hours a week, and keeps everything financially stable while she stays at home. Another thing is that she also credits him with leading their faith and bringing her closer to God. In her storytelling, he is not just a husband. He is a living example of what happens when a man steps into the role of God supposedly designed for him and a woman follows without resistance. This is the model. This is the pitch. And this is the evidence that Savannah faith stone brings to the table which is why exactly his presence matters so much. Noah is around 23 years old. He met Savannah when she was 17 and he was 20 and they first connected on Instagram which feels fitting given that so much of their relationship now exists for public consumption. They met in person soon after and then they got engaged and then they were married 3 days after. 3 days is not a lot of time to decide what shapes your entire future. But in influencer land, it is apparently enough for divine clarity. He has appeared on podcast alongside her just sitting quietly while she talks at length about submission, biblical marriage and gender roles. And this is where people really started to pay attention because something about those appearances uh they feel off. He often looks stiff, detached, like he's repeating lines rather than speaking from his own place. Someone actually said that never seen two people look less comfortable together. Especially not a young couple supposedly living out the happiest version of marriage possible. In photos, he often looks exhausted. Not just someone who is tired, but he looks like someone who's been worn down in a way that clashes sharply with this image of him that is being sold online by his supposed wife who knows everything. This is meant to be the ideal. This is supposed to be what peace and order looks like. And yet, the visual story does not quite match the message. Before becoming Savannah on screen's husband, Noah worked as a personal trainer and fitness model. And he was already invested in shaping his image and selling this lifestyle. And that experience just transfers neatly into influencer marriage where presentation is everything and reality just comes second. He knows how to pose. He knows how to perform and he definitely understands branding. His health has also become part of the conversation. It has been reported that he takes anava and anava is an anabolic steroids that is often associated with bodybuilding and low testosterone treatment. So, people have pointed out the irony because they're like, "If traditional masculinity is truly natural, effortless, and God ordained, why does maintaining the image so often involve chemical assistance?" Allegedly. Okay. Allegedly, it raises uncomfortable questions that do not sit well with the rigid rules that is being promoted. What makes Noah especially interesting is not just when he appears, but when he disappears. There are stretches where he's absent from Sabana's content entirely. Each time that happens, speculation ramps up immediately. Rumors have spread and people have commented and filled in the blank spaces. People have noticed the lack of warmth, the physical distance, the way he seems more like a prop than a partner when he does show up with Savannah. And at this point, whether the marriage is deeply genuine or carefully curated or something in between almost stops mattering because the uncertainty is part of the appeal. The ambiguity just keeps people watching. In Savannah's world, Noah is not just a husband. He is the structure that is holding the brand upright. He is the living argument that submission works and that hierarchy brings peace and also that this life is not only possible but this is the most ideal life for anybody. And the more people question that image the more valuable it becomes because on the internet mystery is currency and this marriage runs on mystery. But let's speak about the lavender marriage speculation. Okay. The thing that keeps trailing Savannah faith stone around is not actually her take on feminism. Those are loud, sure, but they are very predictable. What really refuses to go away is a rumor that has grown legs of its own. And it is a claim that her husband Noah Stone is gay and that their marriage fits what people call the lavender marriage. Historically, a lavender marriage refers to a straight presenting marriage entered into as a cover, usually so that one or both partners could hide being qu from their family or their employer or the public at large. It was about survival. In eras where being openly gay could cost someone their career or their housing or their safety, marrying someone of the opposite sex was sometimes the least dangerous options. Hollywood in the early 20th century is full of examples. Actors and public figures whose career depended on appearing respectable, straight and married, just always engaged in lavender marriage. A lavender marriage is not always cold or cruel. In some cases, the people involved care deeply about each other and agree to the arrangement as a practical way to build stability in an unforgiving world. In others, it is a strictly public performance with private lives kept carefully separate. What defines it is not vibes or like speculation but what defines it is intent. The marriage exits part B to meet social expectation and also manage appearances not purely because of romantic or sexual attraction. It is also very important to say this clearly because the internet is terrible at it. Not every mixed orientation marriage is a lavender marriage. People experience attraction in complicated ways. Some people only understand their sexuality later in life. Some couples look unconventional from the outside and are still completely genuine. The difference comes down to what both partners knew, agreed to, and were trying to protect. So why does this rumor cling so tightly to the stones? The claim are not based on proof in the traditional sense. There is no smoking gun. Instead, people have criticized them and people who've criticized them have pointed to a collection of small repeatable observations. Noah's body language in podcast appearances also gets dissected. People says that he seems emotionally flat, physically distant or uncomfortable sitting next to his wife. More than one viewer has connected that the two people appear awkward together in a way that feels so strange for a newly married couple whose relationship is being sold to the world as the ideal marriage, especially when it comes to someone living a conservative life. Old photos from Noah's time as a fitness model also gets dragged back into circulation. Some people label certain poses as gaycoded. I don't know what that means, but Savannah dismisses that outright and says that they are standard modeling poses, which to be fair, they often wear. Men's fitness modeling is not exactly known for sublity or modesty. >> My second claim is that men and women are not equal and should not be treated as such. >> Well, then why is your man posting online like he gotten only fans? >> And there is also the way Savannah talks about sex. She brings it up often, but the framing is very transactional. Intimacy is described as something a wife owes and something that keeps a marriage functioning, something you give rather than share. According to Savannah, so many people have read this as overcompensation, as if the performance matters more than the experience itself. People that support her, they've heard obedience and duty. Like I said, same word, different years. Then things took a turn from speculation into outright mess. fake profals using um Noah's photos appeared on Grinder and Tinder clearly designed to keep the rumor alive. At that point, whatever conversation might have existed about the public image has crossed into harassment and in internet personalities piling on for clout including diss tracks and dozens of Tik Toks and the whole thing slid firmly into circus territory. Savannah eventually addressed the rumors head on. She denied them directly and called them the most ridiculous accusation she had ever heard. >> I dare any of you raging lunatic leftists to come up to my face or my husband's face in public and say that to my face or his face. You could easily sit behind the screen. You can easily post your viral little videos. You can easily hide behind a screen and post comments. But what I know none of you would ever do is come up to our faces and say that because you know exactly what would happen. I am not in the turning the cheek business. Sorry. Especially when you berade my husband and when you try to attack a marriage. My husband and I are fine. Our marriage has never been better. Social media will never ever affect that. Your little comments, your little hate videos, that'll never ever affect my reality that my husband is genuinely the most God-fearing, patient, humble, masculine, protective provider man that you will ever meet. And so many of the people in our lives would tell you that as well. None of you have ever met him in person, have ever talked to him, so you have absolutely nothing to say. And shame on you. Go find a hobby, go touch grass. You can disagree with me in what I say all day. It does not affect me whatsoever. People are always going to disagree. But the second you come for my marriage and come for my husband, no, we're not doing that. She also pointed out the hypocrisy of people claiming to support gay rights while using gay as an insult. Her argument was simple. If you have never met her husband, you do not know him better than she does. Noah's response has also landed very differently. He has brushed the rumors off as unserious and said that he did not feel the need to respond because he did not see them as real threat. In one interview, he added that he did not want to come across as too masculine. >> Introduce yourself. Say hello. >> Oh, they're going to freak out over this one. >> Have Have you Have you been on Yeah, just just pan that out a little bit. Have you been on social media since all this has happened? You can be further away. We Okay. Yeah. Um lightly. Not as not as much as I was in my past. Um it's just kind of not my focus. And I really don't feel the need to stand up to something that isn't a real threat, >> frankly. And I don't mean to like sound like over masculine or anything, but it like I don't there's nothing until something affects our marriage physically or in like the real life or like in the present moment, then yes, I will act out and do what I need to do to defend and protect what we have together. But until then, like it's it's a waste of my time. It's a waste of my energy. I need to focus on building my business and where I'm going and the current business that I'm at and like focusing on investing into her and loving her instead of like being all distracted with all of this like noise that's just like complete like buffoonery and fake. That one sentence immediately became its own talking point because of course it did. But before I move on, let me address something. Someone coming to say, "Oh, you people are using gay as an insult, but you claim to care about gay rights." But girl, you're the same person that said that gay people do not add anything to the society. So now why are you trying to overcompensate with gayness? If that makes sense. Why you trying to overcompensate with gayness? Hopefully that makes sense. I and my friends, we were talking about this. I just want to say this before it leaves my head. But I and my friend, we were talking about this. We were having like a whole deep conversation about this whole Savannah thing. And I was like, first of all, red flags, red flags, red flags. From the get- go, your husband when you told him, "Oh, the Holy Spirit said that you're going to be my husband and he just accepted, he did not say anything." Again, a typical man, a typical man, especially after the first date and you trying to like husband them. A typical man is going to like hesitate a bit and then after engagement, you got married like after 3 days, uh, another red flag. I'm not saying that you cannot get I know people get engaged and get married that same day but like things are just like giving red flag and again another thing that I and my friend spoke about was the fact when she says that oh you give your body to your man whenever he needs it. I'm not saying that her man is I'm not saying that they're in a lavender marriage, but what I'm saying is maybe if a man is trying to hide his sexuality or is not interested in a woman, obviously it's not going to be every time where he would want to engage sexually to her and whenever he's ready, even if she's not ready because this may be a rare opportunity in their marriage, she could give in. And because she's giving in whenever he's ready and she's not, all of this are speculation and alleged. Okay, I'm just coming from the base where if her husband actually g if they in a lavender marriage. So because she's leaving this she want she's projecting onto other people saying your husband owns your body. Hopefully that makes sense. I'm not saying that this is true but it's just what I speculated in my head. Okay, let's continue. Okay, but at this stage the truth is probably less dramatic than the speculation. There is no concrete evidence that Savannah Stone and her husband are in a lavender marriage. What exists inside is a feedback loop. A hyper vvisible couple built on rigid gender roles and extreme anti-LGBTQ rhetoric, awkward on camera chemistry, and a fan base that insists that everything is perfect. That combination invites crit whether it is fair or not. And here's the uncomfortable part. The rumor sticks not because it is proven, but because it clashes so directly with the brand that Savannah is selling. She has built her platform on certainty, on rigid definitions of masculinity and femininity, on the idea that everything falls into place when people follow the roles that God has assigned to them. Any ambiguity threatens that story. In today's world, especially in a world that attention has become currency. Ambiguity is dangerous and profitable at the same time. The less clearly something is explained, the more people fill in the gaps themselves. Whether the marriage is genuine or is strained or is performative or simply awkward on camera almost becomes secondary. What keeps people watching is not the answer. But guess what it is? It is a [ __ ] question. Are you in a lavender marriage or not? Girl, we need to know. Oh, in case you do not know, maybe you should like sit down and ask your husband that very very well. Like girl, like boy talk to me. Boy, talk to me. I know he's come to me, but like you know, talk to me babe. How do you marry a woman and then turn around and let a man bend you over? >> Okay, now let's talk about the controversy and the backlash. Savannah Faith Stone. I'm sorry I keep calling her full name because I don't know like I'm like Savannah Faith Stone. Okay, she does not simply endure controversy. She actively works into it. She shapes it and she uses it to keep her platform moving. Y'all, I am working on a case as to why all Republicans or conservative women have that look. Okay, I thought I could finish it yesterday, but there is just a lot of study on it, which honestly going into this, I didn't think there was a lot of study on it. Like there's even like a Wikipedia page. I'm sorry I just sidetracked, but like I cannot wait to finish working on that piece. But oh my god, y'all. Like things I've learned in that case. Oh, I'm so sorry for sidetracking. Like it goes deep deep deep deep. and I can't wait to share with you guys and I hope when it comes out you guys watch. But let's continue. The entire structure of her online presence depends on friction. When nothing is upsetting people, her content loses energy. Engagement slows down. The growth of her content just stalls and outrage is what keeps the machine running. Anyone familiar with right-wing influencer culture will recognize the pattern immediately. She puts out a deliberately provocative claim. People will push back. She responds with defensiveness or clarification and the argument itself keeps her name circulating. Visibility increases and that turns into money and then the process starts again. It happens so often in nearly the same way every time that it's very difficult to tell where sincere beliefs end and performance begins. The consent video made that pattern impossible to ignore. When she said that consent does not exist in marriage, she faced the most intense backlash that she had experienced up to that point. So many people that do not like her or like her critics, they were very quick to point out that the statement sounded like it justified rape within marriage. The response was very very harsh as it should be. And as someone who has said that she would never take down any post, she deleted the video again, despite having said repeatedly that she would never take down anything that she posted. Um, and I refuse to take down any of my videos that get backlash because I said what I said and I said it and I'm not going to take anything back. the next day. The delusion itself mattered, but her explanation mattered just as much. She did not say that she had reflected on the message or understood why people found it harmful. She said that the video had been mass reported by people who disliked her. Even in retreat, she framed herself as the target of an attack rather than someone who might have been wrong. That video was part of a broader run of blunt sexual opinion, including the claims that watching porn could count as cheating, even when both partners have agreed that it is acceptable. But the consent line stood out because of how final it sounded. >> These are my sex hot takes. >> Hey, I'm Cat. I am a pastor's wife and married for 21 years. Here are mine. She says that corn is cheating. I agree. Corn is also detrimental to your brain and to your relationship. There's lots of research on it. So, if you don't agree, that's fine. Just go draw your own conclusions from the research. Number two, she says consent does not exist in marriage. And I could not disagree harder. Okay. Just because just because to become one in the marital relationship. Just because my body is for my husband and his body is for me because exclusively we only do those things with each other because we are in a monogous relationship does not mean that he has a right to my body or I have a right to his body anytime I want it or he wants it. Okay? Bodily autonomy still exists. Okay? Consent still matters even if you're a Bible believing Christian and married. Okay? Consent matters. We have got to stop this rhetoric. Okay? It is dangerous. It is dangerous for women and men. Okay. It's dangerous. Consent matters. Okay. All right. Third, she talks about you should not let yourself go in marriage. I agree. I agree. You should take care of yourself for you and for your partner. You should try to stay attractive for you and in your relationship. I agree. I think that matters both ways. Chastity should be reserved for a time of fasting and prayer, not just cuz you don't feel like it. M okay the scripture she's talking about is it does say that if you are going to take time apart for a time of fasting and prayer you both should agree on it and then you should come back together okay so that temptation does not enter if you're going to take time apart intimately in a marriage yeah you should talk about that everybody has their own needs and so you should talk about what's going on okay absolutely and you should agree on when you're going to come back together okay but temptation is a personal issue. I'm going to hold your hand and say this as gently as I possibly can. Cheaters are going to cheat. Cheaters are going to cheat no matter how often you're intimate with them. They're going to cheat no matter how cute you are. They're going to cheat no matter how much you do for them. Cheaters are going to cheat. It is 2025. It is high time that we stop using the Bible as a weapon. And we stop using purity culture nonsense and we stop using guilt and shame to tell women especially that they are the reason their husbands cheated because they didn't look good enough because they didn't give them enough sex. No, ma'am. That is no. Cheaters are going to cheat. Okay? Period. Full stop. Don't hear what I'm not saying. Okay? I'm not saying that you shouldn't take care of yourself. Okay? I'm not saying that you shouldn't have a good healthy sex life in your marriage, okay? I think that you should. I think it's an important vital part of your relationship. And if you're not having sex for long periods of time in your marriage, there's probably a deeper issue that you need to look into. Okay? I got married at 18. I am wellversed in purity culture and all the things that people try to use oneline scriptures out of the Bible to hold things over people's heads. And that is not what we should be doing. Okay? So, I hope this helps. Love you. Bye. >> Guys, I just discovered who Savannah Stone was. And like, not to be a hater, but she has my absolute nightmare of a life. Like, being a tried wife at 20 years old. Mm- mm. And I get it. Everyone has their own opinion and like some people may love that lifestyle, but this is my page. So, I'm going to talk about how I don't like that lifestyle. And also like basing her marriage off of like religious beliefs and having rules for your husband. If I ever have rules for my husband, why are we why are we to have rules in our relationships? Like, you shouldn't have to have rules. That's the point of a relationship. Anyways, I saw a video because there was a creator talking about her on my for you page. Um, and she was mocking liberal women. I don't know if it's the financial manipulation I experienced as a child, but I refuse to never have a job in my marriage. Okay? I never want to be that wife that is not contributing financially, even if it's in a small way. Because the thought of being owned by someone and having someone have a say in everything that I do, spend my money on um because it's their money. Like, no, I want to make my own money so that um I'm never like held down, controlled by a person. It's just trauma. But um and being 20 years old and not having like a personality outside of being married, that's I have also have like a huge problem with codependence. You know, you have to be your own person before you can get married. and like be in a relationship and give your all to a relationship. But I'm I'm like watching her videos and I'm like this is my worst fear and I'm 24. I've already passed that threshold. But like also I would hate to be living that lifestyle right now at 24. I'm too young. I'm too young. I'll get married later. Saying that once a woman is married, her body belongs to her husband leaves little room for reinterpretation. The language treats marriage as ownership rather than a partnership. In that framing, personal boundaries disappear and consent becomes very irrelevant. Many people heard it as the idea that once vows are spoken. No longer means no. She later posted a follow-up video explaining what she meant or what she said she meant. And for so many people, it felt like a very familiar tactic. An extreme statement is posted without consent. >> This is Savannah Stone. She recently has gone viral for saying that consent doesn't exist within marriage and then making a follow-up video saying, "You misunderstood me." And then going on to describe consent. And since I've covered Ballerina Farm and Nara Smith heavily for having undertones of Tradife and cultiness to their content in a much less obvious way, I figure it's time to talk about Savannah Stone, who creates very much more obvious, in-your-face, like clickbaity trad. I've been following her stuff for a little while, just trying to get the vibes, trying to figure out like what level of cultiness this is, where this is coming from, if there is like a specific culty church that she's part of, or if she's just perpetuating some of these more high control conservative beliefs and values because she is super super young. I keep seeing on all the posts about her that she is only 19 years old, which is like prime age for someone to be very um intense and passionate about these cultlike beliefs, especially if you were raised in it. I find her content fascinating and obviously pretty harmful, and I feel like I could do a culty like response video to almost every single thing she posts. But one of the things that has stood out to me across her content is the feeling of superiority that comes along with having cult-like beliefs or being part of a cult. I feel like that's one of the things we don't talk about nearly as much when it comes to cults because we're often fascinated with like weird and kooky beliefs and like specific methods of control. But one of the attractive parts of being in a cult or any type of cult-like system is the feeling of superiority and certainty in like any and all aspects of your life. You truly feel like you have everything figured out. No matter if you're 19 years old or 50, 60, 70 years old in a cult. You don't have to live in discomfort and you don't have to live in the gray areas of life because the cult gives you all the answers you need. You don't need to live and have experience or listen to other people's experience because the cult has all the answers. It's really hard to have any level of nuance or step outside of that and leave all of that behind, especially when you're young, especially when you're at like prime seeking age and want to have answers to life and want to feel grown up and want to feel like you know what you're doing, which is how I got wrapped up into an evangelical cult when I was 20 years old. And it is just really sad to see that like I get it. I understand. And when you have a big platform perpetuating these thoughts and these beliefs and you're getting a lot of traction and a lot of views, it becomes potentially super harmful to other young people and maybe to even herself in the future. Outrage spreads if further than a careful argument ever could. A clarification follows, generating another wave of attention. Whether this was planned or instinctive, the outcome is always predictable. The controversy kept her visible and the followup allowed her to cast herself as the victim while still reinforces the same underlying belief. Afterwards, she said that her earlier political Tik Toks had been mass- reported and removed as well. This fits a pattern that she returns to repeatedly. She posts something extreme, it gets reported, the platform intervenes. She then points to that intervention as proof that people are trying to silence her. Over time, that story becomes inseparable from the brand. moderation stops looking like a response to harm and it starts being framed as evidence that she must be telling the truth. The consent video is now the example that so many people have pointed to when they argue that she is not just controversial but she is genuinely dangerous. It is not a simple bad thing. It reflected a misunderstanding of consent that could normalize abuse, especially for people who are young that listen to her who may not yet know how to challenge what they are hearing. And again, you recorded it, you edited it, you watched it so many times before you posted it online and something in your peanut brain told you that that was the best thing or statement to say. And it's so annoying because she stood by it for so long and that impact lingered on the internet. and her claim that he applies only to healthy biblical marriages does not hold much weight when she has also said that she would never leave her husband even if he cheated repeatedly. In her world view, what counts as healthy shifts when he needs to. Y'all should not forget this woman does not have a fully developed frontal lobe. So I don't know if she fell when they gave birth to her because I don't understand this method of reasoning is very very outrageous. Her public argument with Emily Wilson also showed how quickly a platform built this way can turn inward. The two clash on a show linked to the Daily Wire. This was not a debate between political opposites because Emily Wilson who also goes by Emily Saves America is controversial in her own right and she operates in the same ideological space. Um she is also Republican. She stays in LA or whatever whatever. Like I really don't I don't have energy for those Republican conservative people, you know. But anyways, both of them they were competing for the same audience, each representing herself as a representative for young conservative women. When the discussion started to turn against Savannah, accusations about a lavender marriage surface. At that point, the disagreement stopped being about ideas and it just became very personal. The fact that she draws this level of criticism even from conservative media is very telling, okay, is giving me Ch the racist. Her rig positioning does not just attract push back from the left. It leaves her exposed to attacks from the same people who should theoretically be her ally. >> And I think it's good if you're talking about women initiating divorce and being unhappy. I think a good part of that is how do we keep women happy and stop that from happening. So saying, oh, you know, not forcing if if going to work 3 hours a week makes her happy, whatever it is, then maybe that should be also a priority if the divorce is initiated and so high. I have this crazy idea. Maybe we should restrict the divorce laws again. But that's much that's the much more trad right-wing view. Savannah, you have been characteristically demure, quiet, and trad. Uh, final word. >> Um, I mean, I so I personally don't think women should vote, and that's probably going to be a very far uh opinion, and that's not to get male validation. That's simply like I I maybe they maybe married women because it would just be like my husband having another vote. But you know during like the suffragist movement they they sold this to women as oh well now you can vote differently than your husband. So now you have choice. And so if we're going to erase women's choice as in you know going on only fans or working or whatever it may be then you you you have to repeal the 19th too. I mean I just don't that we're losing elections. who lost in uh what was it 2020 because women single women were voting. Uh so I think that that's a problem. >> I thought it was the ballot dropboxes. But it's a fair point. I mean there were plenty of women during the suffrage >> fraud voter ID but it's like also didn't you vote didn't you vote for Trump? >> Well my Yeah, but it was like my husband had another vote. I'm not voting against my husband. >> If I was voting against my husband that would be a problem. >> I don't think couples should be voting against each other. I >> And I think the man should be the head of the household. So I I can see that element of it for sure. Women side >> I'm I'm kind of in between cuz like I don't want to be told I can't vote. I I'm single too so I don't want to be told I can't vote. Like I would be told look sorry to interrupt Melanie but I'm I'm a a millennial. Millennials have voted traditionally for Democrats. If you told me Michael we're going to disenfranchise all the millennials. You'll never get to vote again but we're going to get good government. Say like where do I sign up? Take all my votes please. I don't it's a hassle to go vote. What do I need that for? The point of the voting is the good government and and the to your point Savannah, I mean there were a lot of women who were opposed to the suffragettes and they didn't want to the the right to vote. And the reason I don't think was that they were, you know, dumb or slaves or something like that. Their arguments were the argument that uh the basic unit of society should be the family, not the individual. So they were making principled arguments. You can disagree with those arguments. Obviously, they're kind of irrelevant now because women have had the right to vote for 100 years, but but they were making serious arguments. So then I don't know. I mean, what do you say, Emily? I I I don't think we're going to repeal the 19th Amendment anytime soon. But but is it uh would it not be more conservative if the if the political order was based on the family rather than the individual? >> Yeah. But there's also that goes across too many different things of like rights that we should have. And that's just it's just ridiculous. I don't like I don't even really believe like Yeah. Okay. Would we be more conservative? Sure. Would I risk like all females not being able to vote? No. And I don't really think females believe that. I think they say these things online to get male validation. >> Savannah, are you a pick me? Are you doing pick me stuff? >> I'm married. I'm married. I don't need to be picked. I've already been picked. >> But every single thing you say is literally appealing to men and usually hating on women as well. Which is funny cuz I would think if I was in a happy marriage, I would even do this. like I would just go out and just be happy and do my thing. I think the advice you give to women is awful. I think it's at a detriment to them. And I don't think it comes from true happiness. And I think it really does come out of insecurity from being in frankly a lavender marriage as everyone online can see. >> I disagree. I think >> are you that easily manipulated by Tik Tok rumors? >> What is it? Can you Can you clear up for a millennial? What's a lavender marriage? >> Man in two seconds. >> Oh, a lavender marriage is when you like >> Okay. Why do you think I called you out for hating me specifically? >> Isn't a lavender marriage usually >> berated my husband online? You bered my husband for absolutely no reason. >> No, I just looked at I just looked at two seconds as Oh, that's a gay man. That's why she's she's what >> that's I I think that's uncalled for. I don't know anybody's personal lives here. This is what I if she This is the thing my perspective of what I'm seeing. Savannah is saying all this because she is in an ideal situation. She's in a happy situation. So when an ideal >> situation married to a potentially gay man at what 19 is a >> listen as someone who's who's tap danced in his life I want you to know not every guy who's a little theatrical is lighting the loafers. All right on that note >> what stands out is that both women are playing by the same rules. They are young, they outspoken, they are selling traditional values as something that is rebellious. There are only so many spots at the top of that niche. So when they collided, Emily reached for the accusation that would hurt the most. And it just shows how quickly alliances collapse when a brand is built on moral certainty and constant callout. The same weapon you use on others eventually gets turned back on you. Her conflict with Erica Perry pushed this dynamic even further. After a tense appearance on the whatever podcast, Emily launched what Savannah described as a harassment campaign. Emily posted dozens of attack videos repeatedly referencing Savannah supposed gay marriage and or sorry gay husband and released a diss track mocking Noah with slurs. Emily is not a major influencer yet the response was intense. That intensity reveals something about Savannah's brand. Because she presents herself as this morally superior and unshakable person. Even a small perceive law invites aggressive backlash. People do not just disagree with her. They want to dismantle her credibility. The lavender marriage rumor that went around on social media just works as a weapon because it strikes directly at the contradiction in her message. A Redditor commented something and this Redditor just summed up a frustration that many people share by saying that Savannah caters to men who has sexist views and dismisses women's basic rights and then she acts surprised when she's being called a pikmi. The issue is not the insult itself, is the pattern behind it. She aligns herself with men who do not respect women and then expresses shock when the disrespect is turned on her. Emily being in the picture also like shows how easily her own tactics gets reversed. Savannah has built a career on saying inflammatory things and acting surprised when people react strongly. But when someone responds to her in the same way, coming in just as hard and getting personal, refusing to let it go, it suddenly becomes harassment. Okay, girl, tell me, rule for them, not for me. The rules only seem to apply in one direction. She can argue that consent has no place in marriage and call it biblical wisdom. But mocking her husband's sexuality is treated as crossing a line. Okay, there is also a performative quality to this feud. Emily knows that attacking Savannah brings attention and Savannah knows that calling Emily a hater support her support her persecution narrative. Both gain visibility from the conflict. They present themselves as enemy while feeding the same attention machine. What ties all of these incidents together is that none of them cause lasting damage to her platform. They stay in the moment but they keep her visible and the algorithm does not distinguish between praise and outrage. It only registers engagement and in that environment being talked about matters more than the harm that has been caused. Over time, Savannah has learned to treat criticism as confirmation. Anger means that she's struck enough. Takeown means that the truth is being suppressed and push back from fellow conservative means that they cannot handle her honesty. Every response that she gives just becomes proof to her. And she also understands one basic rule when it comes to getting attention. Nuance rarely spreads. Clear extreme claims actually spread faster than nuance. And another thing is that outrage moves faster than careful explanation. Whether people admire her or despise her, every view, every comment, every reaction or every essay just adds fuel to the same system. And that is a trap. And it is especially hard to avoid when the claims are disinflammatory and capable of causing real harm to people who take them seriously. Now, let's speak about monetization. Savana Faith Stone spends a lot of time just telling women that the ideal life is staying home, serving a husband, and stepping away from paid work. The problem is that her own life looks nothing like the version that she is selling. Savannah works full-time as a content creator. She earns money from multiple streams with the most reliable one being the Submissive Society. So, Submissive Society is a paid membership community host on school. The group cost $49 a month and it originally launched at $19. Then quietly, it jumped in price. As of early 2026, it has 184 members, which works out to roughly $9,000 a month in recurring income. Over a year, and that is well into six figures, and that is before anything else is added. Um, Savannah, if you want women to stay full-time at home and not work, where do you expect them to get money from to pay for your course on how to be submissive? And the women paying genuinely, is everything okay at home? Because you're paying money to hear a woman tell you that your body is not your own and that it belongs to your man and that there is no consent in marriage and you should not leave your husband even if he cheats 100 times. You are literally paying money to someone who tells you that it is okay for you to lower your standard for a man to walk all over you. Really, look, I just told you everything about that course. You do not have to pay. Instead, use that money for something useful. The group offers weekly coaching, calls, recorded lessons, and lifestyle resources like recipes, all aimed at women who want to practice what Savana calls traditional femininity. It also leans heavily on the idea of sisterhood and support, presenting itself as a safe space where women can work together towards the same goals. Um, Savannah frames it as a place where real transformation happens, a more serious and meaningful environment than her public social media. Membership fees are only one part of the picture. She also makes money through brand partnership. She has promoted perfumes, supplements, protein bars, and every other product. She appears regularly on podcasts like fresh and fit and the whatever podcast which either pays directly or function as marketing that drives traffic back to her paid offerings. Her YouTube channel generates ad revenue through long Q&A videos. I think she has just 6K videos on her YouTube channel and I don't think that would pay as much and she also post short which she gets like a reasonable amount of views but not that much. and both her Tik Tok and Instagram offer creator payouts tied to engagement. This is not a small contradiction that can be brushed aside. It is built into the structure of her platform. She argues that women should stay out of the workforce. Yet, her own life is defined by constant work. She produces content. She manages a paid community. She negotiates brand deals. She films ads. She maintains multiple social platforms. She asks other women to accept limits that she does not accept for herself. She has also criticized influencers for constantly selling products to their people only to turn around and do exactly that. At one point, she posted a video complaining that people were tired of influencers always pushing product, then followed up with several sponsored posts less than 2 days later. Can't make this [ __ ] up. There was nothing subtle about her. One thing about her is the contrast between what she says and what she does is just very obvious. This pattern is not unique to Savannah. So many people that have studied these tradings and these treadwife influencers have pointed out that many of them package right-wing politic as a lifestyle brand. They profit from the same attentiongdriven internet culture that they claim to oppose. The model is simple. Build a personal brand that feels authentic and intimate and keep followers emotionally invested. then turn that attention into money through ads, sponsorship, and paid communities. Put plainly, this is not just about how someone chooses to live. It is about selling a version of life to others. Honestly, I'm going to say it. The real career being sold is teaching other women how not to have one. The strategy is clever in a cold way. You make money by telling women that the most proper arrangement is for their husbands to be the sole earners while you yourself remains financially independent. If the advice were truly about health, balance or stepping back temporary, it would be framed honestly and responsibly. Instead, it is monetized aggressively. Women are told that working makes them unhappy. Yet, they are asked to pay a monthly fee for guidance. Savannah keeps her own income stream intact while encouraging dependence in others. When things fall apart for the women following her advice, she still has her own brand, her platform and her recurring revenue. Some people have even argued that the tried wife persona functions as a career path in its own right. It turns the performance of tradition into a product and the focus shifts away from what those traditions mean to the people practicing them and towards how much money they can generate from an audience. The performance is what pays. The irony is hard to ignore. Savannah earns a six-figure income by selling the idea that women should not earn their own money. Her business depends on women paying her to argue against women being paid. If financial independence is truly the problem she says it is, your question becomes unavoidable. Why is it acceptable for her but not for the women that she is advising? What makes this especially effective is how the message is being framed. The membership group is presented as exclusive, supportive and nurturing. On the surface, it feels like reassurance. Look closer and it starts to feel like encouragement to stay stuck. promises that if women submit enough, perform femininity the right way and follow her guidance, they will regain the happiness that she claims that feminism took from them. In practice, it looks less like rejecting work and more like rebranding it. Savannah is not anti work. She is anti- other women working. She has taken the standard influencer hustle and she's dressed it up in traditional language and sold it back as a moral clarity. The algorithm rewards this. Paid posts keep circulating. Engagement stays high. Meanwhile, she continues telling women that having a job is what makes them unhappy. Even as her own career depends on them believing her enough to pay. You know what? I'm changing the direction of my video essay. I'm now from today henceforth going to lean more to the right. Not because I've suddenly had a political awakening, but because I've noticed something that is very hard to ignore. A lot of these right leaning people do not actually care if what they being sold holds up. You can give them nonsense wrapped in confidence and they will not along happily. It doesn't need to be logical. It doesn't need to be consistent. It just needs to sound certain and very familiar. From a content perspective, it's almost laughably simple. You don't need research. You don't need nuance. You just need to repeat the same talking point and blame the same group and speak like you're delivering forbidden truth. So from today, I support Obama. Hell no. I support the orange Grinch. If the shoe fits, I didn't mention anybody's name. I also support Andrew Tate because I am a property and I must escape the matrix. What's it going to be? The blue pill or the red pill? You know what? The red pill. Fresh and fit, where are you? Like, come on. Let's talk about how women offer nothing to the society and how women are the problem. Meanwhile, I go behind everyone's back and impregnate a prostitute allegedly. Okay, shaking my [ __ ] head off. Anyways, let's talk about the brother pattern. Savannah Stone exists in a world where morality is treated as rigid and unquestionable. Even when the people enforcing it breaks their own rules without hesitation, in her version of reality, those contradictions are not flaws. They are part of the system. The rules are not meant to be lived by equally. They are meant to be enforced downward. Like I said, she reminds me of just pearly things, but like they kind of look alike, you know? And she's 19. She looks older than her age. Like I'm 30. I'm 30 and I look younger than her. Like I don't know. All Republicans and like conservative women, they have the same face. They look older than their self. Their face looks stiff. Yeah. Um I don't know. I I don't make the rules, but think about it. Like it's like being Republican or conservative. Like it's so stressful that it shows it up in them. They age faster than they literally should. Yo, I'm 30. I'm 30. I'm 30. I'm 30. I'm turning 31 in 10 months. I'm 30. Clock that tea. Anyways, like I said, she looks like she reminds me of just pretty things. And literally same formula, same dumb thinking. Her rise mirrors a very familiar pattern among conservative people who talk endlessly about traditional values. while quietly living in ways that contradict them. The message is what matters, not the behavior. As long as the performance hold, the people does not seem to mind the gap between what is said and what is done. The controversy surrounding Elijah Schaefer makes this painfully clear. In early February 2026, Schaefer, who is a farright podcaster known for preaching traditional family values, was reported to have had an affair with his employee Sarah Stark. And Sarah herself has built a following by promoting strict Catholic morality and condemning extrammarital sex. For years, she publicly framed fornication as a moral failure and she positioned herself as an authority on sexual restraint. According to so many reports, the affair began at Sea Park in February 2025 after a night of heavy drinking and continued for roughly 6 months. Late audio later surface in which Sarah admitted to the relationship and said that she planned to hide it from her boyfriend at the time which was the man that she would later marry. not take any accountability at all because like I it obviously was my fault too what happened between us but even that was like not like I don't know I felt like it was like like he got me like very intoxicated like I don't even like remember most of it and I was even like thinking back cuz it was like at CPAC the two nights um you're there and the second night I was like breaking out and like a rash. And so he's like, "Oh, like get some benadryil. It'll help with the rash." And like now I'm thinking back and I was like that's probably why I like blacked out because he like intentionally gave me benadryil and like sent me a bunch of shots and stuff. And like obviously that's like stupid on my part >> um to like go along with that, you know, but at the same time it's like he obviously like knew what he was doing. So he had he had it in his mind. Benadryl what? Like does that just make it increases like the toxicity or something like gets you really? >> Yeah. Like Yeah. Like mixing like a drug like that with alcohol. >> When was C what what was it? Cpek. >> That was when I very first met him in February. >> Uh where was CPAC? I don't even remember this. >> Oh DC. Oh that was in DC. Oh I got you. Yeah. Vanadril for a breakout. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. Okay. That's crazy. Yeah. He is he's he I know how >> again like I'm saying like I'm not saying I don't like have any fault in that. Like I like it like definitely like ate me up for like a long time. >> Yeah. >> I feel very bad about it still. >> Yeah. Um but yeah, >> damn. Yeah, that's uh it's tough. And I mean, I don't know. I don't know how you feel about the guy now, but it's like it's probably worse that you don't that you like the more that you learn about him and know who he really is, it probably makes the whole thing worse a little bit. >> Um yeah, for sure. >> Yeah. What is >> I mean I just don't want anything to do with him. Like I just >> I I get you. I totally get you. What What did he say about his family? Like because obviously he has like a family and kids. What was his excuse with that though? Like how would he justify that? >> He's like he was like, "Oh, my wife doesn't care. She lets me like she lets me run run free if she doesn't care as long as cuz I like take such good care of her and she just lets me be a man and like do what I want and blah blah blah." Like he was like saying that stuff. Yeah. >> Says like the wife doesn't care. Wow. >> Yeah. >> So he has an open relationship. Huh? That's crazy. >> Which I mean, >> did you ever question that or like >> I was like that's definitely not like I like realized that's not true, >> right? But um also like at the time like it seemed like I don't know just like the way he acted and everyone acted around him and the things he would say around girls and almost like seem like that was true. Does that make sense? >> Yeah. And like obviously like I deeply regret that but also like I'm not a [ __ ] Like I mean that's like a horri a horrible thing but it's not like I really am like sleeping around or have been. So >> yeah. I mean you don't you don't have to defend yourself. >> It's kind of Yeah, I know. But I'm just saying like it's kind of just like not even true for like anyone who knows me. So >> yeah. I mean, you just had a fling with Elijah and that's I don't know. I guess he got upset about it. He was calling He's just exaggerating. Yeah. I mean, did you I guess you're not going to tell anyone, huh? Or I guess I was going to ask like would you tell your husband? I guess this is before your husband, right? >> Yeah. No, we weren't engaged. >> Oh, okay. But no, I'm not telling anyone. >> Yeah. >> Okay. >> And like I was like, like I said, like very intoxicated. >> So >> he said like it was a couple times like you were traveling around and like maybe in DC and New York and stuff like that. I'm not trying to >> No. Throughout the entire period, both she and Elijah continued publicly advocating for Christian values and traditional moral discipline. And these people are just a bunch of [ __ ] hypocrites. After the story broke, Sarah, she shut down her social media accounts and Elijah's wife filed for divorce. His media company, Rift TV, reported they began to collapse. And when Emily Saves America, responded to the situation, she dismissed the talk of traditional values as pure performance. She was right. This was not an isolated failure. It followed a pattern that keeps repeating because the people who watch these people allows it to. This pattern extends far beyond sex scandals. There have been recent reporting, according to CNN, that revealed that several right-wing influencers were paid millions of dollars through Russian state media. In 2024, the Justice Department stated that Kremlin may have funneled close to $10 million through Tenet Media, a company that has been connected to people like Tim P, Dave Rubin, and Benny Johnson. That's according to CNN, not me. The influencers claimed that they were unaware of the funding source and framed themselves as victim. Yet, the money has not been returned. These people are bunch of [ __ ] hypocrites. Once again, the behavior directly contradicts the values that being preached by these people. And these values are loyalty, patriotism, nationalism, and moral clarity. And these values have been sold loudly while foreign money has quietly flowed in and all of a sudden you don't know where the funding for your own show is coming from. The people who watch these people, all they do is just shrug and move on. And even Trump has said it himself that if he wants to belong to a party, he would belong to the Republican party because they are bunch of idiots. >> Okay, I know you guys cannot really see me honestly. Like I'm in my room. I'm currently editing. So basically, y'all, so this statement that Trump said about Republican people being like dumbest voters, y'all, I cannot find it on the internet, but I swear during his election, not only did they quote itself trend, even him saying it, it was on Opera show and I went there to like went on the internet to like find proof to add it and it's not there. It's literally not there. There's even this YouTube video called the ver YouTube channel called the verify and literally people under the comment section said I saw it but they're like oh they checked through every archive and it's not there. It's so scary how they just wiped it off the internet and it's very convenient. But anyways I'm just going to say allegedly Trump allegedly said it. Okay, allegedly. But that is so scary because I'm not I'm not running crazy cuz even other people in the comment section were like I saw the video and it was an opera show and even on opera show when you click on the link it's private that's scary not my words your president's words and again you people are not beating the allegations anyways the tried wife aesthetic operates the same way it is marked as natural old-fashioned and rooted in simplicity and yet it is often one of the most carefully curated ated performances online. Many of the women held up as examples are supported by production teams, hired helps and carers that keep them anything but homebound. Ballerina Farm is often treated as the face of the movement, but her public image just leaves out a key fact. She and her husband co-ounded their business together. Her days are filled with planning, filming, brand management, and labor that rivals or exceeds a standard full-time job. Nara Smith presents herself cooking elaborate meals in cout gowns. Yet her income comes from her Tik Tok, her Instagram and social media career and also her modeling career that she built independently. The image says one thing, the reality says another. One thing you should know about this child wife influencer model is that the business strategy is very simple. Sell the idea that a family functions best when the husband is soul earner. then package that reassurance and direct it to women as guidance or as something that's comforting and something that is purposeful in life. This hypocrisy is baked into the model. They look like child wives, but they operate like full scale entrepreneurs. This disconnect just thrives in today's world. And what we call authenticity is just a performance that looks convincing enough. People learn what feels real in a given space and then they adjust their tone. They adjust their habits and they adjust their beliefs to match it. Vulnerability itself becomes curated. It is shared selectively and it is shaped for effect and deployed when it benefits the brand. The harder someone leans into moral certainty the fallout when their actions contradict it. The Colossus Elijah Schaefer scandal is going to fade and the Russian funding story has already cooled down. other influencer will step into this space, repeat the same lines, earn the same money, and write the same cycle until their own inconsistencies sufface. Savannah understands this ecosystem perfectly. She knows her words do not need to match her life. She knows that the people that watch her do not require consistency. So, what matters is that the message feels clear, emotionally satisfying, and familiar. Whether she follows her own advice is besides the point. I mean, for someone who is a conservative person and a tad wife, yo, I'm dyslexic, so sometimes trying to pronounce my words, especially when they have the same like, is it synonyms, is always very hard. But anyways, when she was on the hype house, the one tried white versus eight feminist debate, she wore a short skirt and did loads of makeup. If you want to go by your own logic savannah, you should be fully covered and not speak except you're ordered to speak. Okay, this performance is just a product. there is nothing else to deliver. As long as people want simple moral answers and clear villains, this system will keep working even when the facts never quite line up. Now, let's speak about the rage of trades. When I look at the tradive trend through an academic lens, the sardo status and the leaning dresses just starts to feel less like the point and more like camouflage. Beneath this calm polish aesthetic, there is a current of anger that never really goes away. It just gets dressed up as peace. In a 2025 article published in feminist theory, Sarah Bennett Wiser and Sarah Reinees, they looked closely at this dynamic in their piece, the rage of char. And they analyzed 50wife accounts across Instagram and Tik Tok between April and September 2024. And they came to a clear conclusion. And what's the conclusion? The conclusion is that the serenity is not neutral and it is part of the message. You know the soft lighting, the orderly kitchens, the hyper feminine presentation and not just vibes. They are doing ideological work. Sarah Bernard Wiser and Sarah Reinis, I'm going to call them Sarah and Sarah. Okay, so basically they argue that this perform often sits right next to frustration and resentment. And honestly, I do love their theory. So shrive content regularly frames modern gender politics as a threat and then presents a return to traditional roles as the solution. The anger is there but it is tightly controlled, redirected and aimed very deliberately instead of being pointed at patriarchy or at the systems that makes life harder for women. It gets aimed at feminism itself. What makes the argument interesting is that they point out how child wives and feminists are often reacting to the same underlying failures. Both groups are responding to a system that undervalues care work, offers little structural support and burns people out. The difference is not the feeling, it is where the feeling goes. Women's anger exists in both spaces, but it gets routed in very different directions and produces very different politics. Sarah Sarah Bennett Wiser. She noted that many of the critics that trades make about hustle culture, lack of care, infrastructure, and the low value placed on reproductive labor are not new at all. These are the same issues that mainstream feminism have been raising for decades. Trad influencer often say that they felt pushed into office careers that they hated and they also resented the pressure to build a corporate identity. TW wife influencers often say that they want unpaid labor in the home to be respected and valued. I've heard trades say that being a housewife is honorable and keeps the society running. There is real truth in that statement. It is also nothing new. Feminists have been arguing for the recognition of domestic labor since at least wages of housework movement in the 1970s. The frustration that tried expresses here is very legitimate. The direction they take is what changes everything. Sarah Bannard points out that the triedwife movement works hard to frame itself as the opposite of feminism which it portrays as bitter, angry and joyless. The content plays on real pain points like child care cost, workplace burnout and exhaustion. Then it offers a false choice. Either you are the resentful, the unhappy feminist or you are the calm, fulfilled wife. Anger is pushed out of the trad fantasy and assigned entirely to feminist as if obedience and submission magically erases frustration. But the researchers argues that this staged happiness actually hides a very deep anger. That anger is not aimed at patriarch itself or at capitalism or at political parties that refuses to fund child care or support system. It is just aimed at feminists. Feminism becomes a standin villain for every broken promise and unmet need. This framework fits Savannah's content almost too well. Her videos are not gentle reflections on tradition. They are sharp, confrontational, and very repetitive. They circle back to the same target again and again. She relies heavily on straw man's argument, flattening feminism into a cartoon version of itself. Feminists are framed as ugly, man-hating, child-hating, and miserable so that her own views look reasonable for comparison. In this context, the anger is not even accidental. It is the point. A separate study from the University of Hawaii found similar patterns in childife content, identifying four recurring anti-feminist themes. Feminism is portrayed as incompatible with feminism. One. Secondly, feminism is blamed for women's unhappiness. too. And thirdly, buzz babe culture and capitalism are rejected, but without challenging the systems that create economic pressure. And in some cases, anti-feminism slide into exclusionary views about gender diversity. What stood out in that research is where blame gets placed. Instead of pointing to weak workplace protections, low wages, or the lack of public child care, childwife influencers, they frame feminism itself as the reason women are struggling. That redirection is what makes the movement so persuasive. It starts with real complaints that many people have shared. Child care is expensive. Office work can feel draining and meaningless. House work is still treated as invisible. Then he shifts the frustration away from economic systems and political decisions and drops it squarely onto feminism as if feminism is what made life unaffordable and exhausting. It's easier to blame feminism for sending women to work than to confront the reality that most families cannot survive on one income anymore. When wages stagnate and cost rise, two income becomes a necessity, not a feminist plot. Blaming feminism conveniently avoids asking why government refuses to invest in child care or why corporations benefits from keeping labor cheap and abundant. It's also easier to be angry at feminists than at politicians. Feminists make a simpler target. Holding people in power accountable requires organizing pressure and long-term effort. pointing at a group of women and saying that they ruined everything feels faster and safer. And there is no easier explanation of a pickme behavior than this. Savannah captures this dynamic perfectly. She sees what is broken and she feels the anger, but she aims it sideways. She skips over the system that actually created the problem and attacks the nearest most familiar target instead, women. That misplaced anger gives her content its edge and its appeal. It is also what makes it very dangerous. Conclusion: Savannah Stone is not an isolated case or exchange anomaly. She represents a brother moment in online culture where anger, identity, aesthetics, and politics are all blended together and sold as a coherent product. Her platform shows how contradiction is no longer liability in places where conservative people come together to say their rhetoric, especially when it comes to influencers that call themselves conservatives or right-wing. but is a feature that keeps attention locked in. It is a performance that has been built to provoke reaction. The cycle of provocation, criticism, and response just keeps her visible, and visibility is what turns into money. I feel like us as a collective. We are not angry enough. Like, we can choose not to watch any of her videos. We can block her account. We can pay her no mind. Only then will she realize that her words hold no power. The uncomfortable question this leaves behind is not whether Savannah Stone is sincere. It is whether we have become so accustomed to performance and outrage that we now treat contradiction as normal even when it shapes how people understand gender power and freedom. So I will end my point by saying babe I would advise you to stop all this nonsense and focus on if your husband is lowkey gay or not because the [ __ ] So guys, that brings us to the end of this video. If you guys watch to the end, thank you so much for watching. I really do appreciate each and every one of you. Thank you. I hope you guys subscribe to my channel. Like this video. Subscribe. Like this video and tell me what you guys think about this video. Tell me what you guys think about Savannah. And like if you think she's on the right path or if you think she's headed for destruction. I'm working on a video titled Why do Republican women look like that? Not even women, also men, too. like why do they all look like that? I'm working on that video and hopefully it would be out like let's say March. Let's say March cuz there are other videos that I'm working on but like I need to work on that because even like researching the Sabers case and I was just like getting other rhetorics from like other Republican women and I was just looking at all these Republican women and I was like they all have the same face. Like even Christine Christine Nom like literally the transition of her face really needs to be studied. Like they they do too much. They do they do too much like and this just traces even down to Donald Trump when he had this his beauty pageant thingy. It's just crazy how much these people are so I don't know. I don't know how to put it. They're a character to me honestly. But guys, we've reached the end of our video. Thank you guys so much. What do you guys think about my makeup? You guys like it? I know you guys love it. Okay. What I think about my hair? I made it myself. I'm not going to stop saying it till I take it out. Okay. Okay. I hope yall were able to, you know, understand my drift when I spoke about this. And from today, henceforth, I'm a Republican because it seems like people in that field, I don't know. I don't know. They're on a different type of vibe. They believe anything. They can take anything. But anyways guys, um, thank you guys so much and I really do appreciate the word of you. Until next time. Bye-bye.

Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6Cp-a_68xg2fGWPnpW4o2w/join Apple Podcasts - https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-plot-thickens-with-jewel-amina/id1728012429 Spotify - https://spotify.link/d2ZhGfcqzXb or search, THE PLOT THICKENS WITH JEWELAMINA where ever you listen to your podcasts. If you'd like to support my journey (no pressure!): you can: Buy me a coffee: buymeacoffee.com/julzonuk Shop my Journal - https://amzn.eu/d/0xyNeFv Amazon store front - https://www.amazon.com/shop/influencer-2ce22f5d My Affordable Camera Gear - https://amzn.to/3zk76Kz My Makeup Product List - https://amzn.to/3TxIzbC My Skincare List - https://amzn.to/3MSm3Xn For Bookings, Sponsorship & Enquiries: julzonuk@gmail.com Instagram: julzonuk _______________________________________________________________ Links to support & aid: Operation Olive Branch https://linktr.ee/opolivebranch Eyes on Sudan https://eyesonsudan.net https://warchild.org.uk _______________________________________________________________ music info: Slowly by Smith The Mister https://smiththemister.bandcamp.com Smith The Mister https://bit.ly/Smith-The-Mister-YT Free Download / Stream: https://bit.ly/s-t-mr-slowly Music promoted by Audio Library https://youtu.be/b4p9TiftgJY?si=zB4f2Q9lFU75VCSq _________________________________________________________________