Trump & Paxton Just CHECKMATED The RINOs In Epic Fashion!

All right, ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to the channel. This is an interesting live stream because we're talking about the Senate race in Texas. We already made fun of Jasmine Crockett. Okay, Jasmine Crockpot or Crackpot or Crackhead. People say all these things about her. We made fun of her. We exposed James Taller Rico. He's truly evil. She was ghetto. That guy's actually evil. He he says God is non-binary. So Texas is an important state because Democrats have been trying to turn it blue for a long time. Even without Texans consent, they are willing to do any and everything for Texas to have blue Democrats representing that state. What do you call it when something happens without the host's consent? What do you call it? You know, if someone forces themselves on an individual without their consent, that's what Democrats are trying to do to Texas. They are our wording Texas. That's disgusting. I know. That's how these people are. In the Democrat race, Talerico won. It was convincing. In the Republican race, it's heading to a runoff. You had three main candidates. Wesley Hunt, he got third place. Ken Paxton got second place and John Cornin got first place. The thing is the vote that should have gone to Paxton went to Wesley Hunt. So they kind of shared votes but Cornin didn't get over 50%. So it heads to a runoff. Let me actually show you the end results. So you see there 41.9%. Funny, Texas can count like 99% of votes in like a day, but California can't count, you know, 5,000 ballots. They need 10 weeks. It's cuz they're cheating, obviously. So John Cornin got second place and Ken Paxton got or he got first place. Ken Paxton got second place. It's very close. If you look at the map, it's very obvious that the big metropolitan areas really helped Cornin. You know, those city Republicans who don't have a perception of a good candidate when they see one. Crazy enough, man. Wesley Hunt did not win a single county. That's crazy. Well, after the race, President Trump came out with a statement. He said, "The Republican primary race for the United States Senate in the great state of Texas, a state that I love and won three times in record numbers, the highest vote ever recorded by far, cannot, for the good of the party, and our country itself, be allowed to go on any long longer. It must be stopped. We have an easy to beat radical left opponent, and we have to totally focus on putting him away quickly and decisively." Both John and Ken ran great races, but not good enough. Now, this one must be perfect. My endorsements within the Republican party have been virtually insurmountable. It is such an honor to realize and say that almost everyone I endorse wins and wins by a lot, especially in Texas. I will be making my endorsement soon and will be asking the candidate that I don't endorse to immediately drop out of the race. Is that fair? Is that fair? We must win in November. Thank you for your attention to this matter. And I agree. I don't think it serves Republicans any good to have a runoff. So Trump should endorse Ken Paxton, not John Corin. That's my hope. But after that statement, Ken Paxton came out with a genius statement. Okay, this is like amazing work from Ken Paxton right here. I hope this scores him the Trump endorsement. He posted that the Save America Act is the most important bill the US Senate could ever pass and I'm committed to helping President Trump get it done. I would consider dropping out of this race if Senate leadership, so John Thun agrees to lift the filibuster and passes the Save America Act. John Cornin is a coward who has refused to support abolishing the filibuster to pass this bill. Now, Fox News reporters and establishment and the establishment are trying to destroy me with misinformation. The truth is no one has been more loyal to Trump than me. Fighting the stolen 2020 election, being in Mara Largo when he announced his 2024 campaign and standing with him in New York in the face of Lafair. Oh, got to move myself. For the good of our country and for the good of passing President Trump's agenda, I am determined to help him get this done. Ladies and gentlemen, that's like that's a that's a big card to pull from Ken Paxton because if John Cornin, John John Thun, all the John's in the Senate, if they are serious that they want their boy John Cornin to remain in the Senate, then they have to play ball now. They have to make real commitments. They should possibly do this before Trump makes his endorsement. And then after Paxton posted that, I saw this morning Trump posted the Save America Act. All voters, so he's listing the things that I guess should be or are in the bill. Some of the things are unrelated. All voters voters must show ID to vote, right? All voters must show proof of citizenship in order to vote. Not really true. It's to register to vote, which is almost the same thing. No mail and ballots except for illness, disability, military, or travel. He can't get that done. Congress can't do it. It's unconstitutional because the constitution delegates the manner, place, and time of holding elections to the state legislature. So, some states will do mail-in ballots and other states won't. What we need is a national requirement, classifying what a qualified elector is, making sure it's someone who proves citizenship and also shows ID. And then no men and women's sports, no transmutilation surgery for children. This was actually a disaster of a post because it came out and the first version said no transmutilation surgery for children unless the parents consent to it which is crazy like we we should oppose it totally. So they deleted that original one and posted this one. So, in a way, Trump effectively confirmed the desire to get the filibuster out and get these three things done, or at least these two, voter ID and proof of citizenship. Those are the most important measures ever. So, I love that Ken Paxton is saying, "I would consider, not even I will drop out, I'll consider it. I'll think about it. If the Senate leadership gets rid of that filibuster and gets the Save Act through, that's genius politics right there. It's called leverage. Ken Paxton knows that if he stays in the race and let's say Trump endorses Cornin or I don't know, just god forbid Trump endorses Cornin and Wesley Hunt endorses Cornin as well. And so the establishment gets all the support behind their candidate, the Rhinos. Well, then we're screwed. But if Paxton remains in the race, he sucks a lot of money out of the Rhinos. They don't want that. John Thun has already said he wants Trump to endorse Cornin. Trump didn't make an endorsement in the primary. He let him fight it out. And now you have two winners going to another bout. It was a draw. Trump has to endorse Ken Paxton or play ball with the establishment. John Cornin wants to be in the Senate. Obviously, this guy's like a dinosaur and he's still running. Like still trying. He's forcing himself himself on Texans. Like they don't want him. If you add Wesley Hunt's vote, Wesley Hunt voters are going to be, you know, similar to Ken Paxton voters. If you add their votes together, you know, Ken Paxton would win by 60% in that primary, which is huge for an incumbent, right? It's hu it's a huge margin of loss. So, I'm saying Republicans need to get wise. Trump and his team need to take this opportunity and get these rhinos to get the Save Act through. That's what this is about. Use the leverage you have right now. What happens if the Save Act goes through before November and you know, let's just close our eyes and in three months it goes into effect. Well, every single state has to now require ID. No one can go to the polls without ID. Secondly, every vote has to be pegged to a real citizen with proof in the system. There's no error or room for error. There's no room for fraud at that point because you have national requirements of what a qualified elector is. So, if a post-election investigation or audit reveals a thousand non-citizens, that calls the entire election into doubt. That's why the Democrats are fighting this. And you've heard it plenty of times from Chuck Schumer. They say, of course, they say this is the new Jim Crow, but they mainly say millions of voters don't have proof of citizenship. They don't have a birth certificate. They don't have a passport. Okay. I don't think those are the only two means of proving citizenship, but if they were hypothetically, wouldn't that be like good for Democrats because most conservatives don't have passports or the majority of people with no passports are going to be conservative, you know, not trying to travel anywhere. Like, if we're thinking about it logically, technically the Democrats should be ecstatic. they should be happy. But that's not why they're not pissed that real voters won't find a way to prove their citizenship. They're pissed because the moment you have a national requirement that every voter needs to be a citizen, that ruins the election fraud apparatus. means the chain of custody on every ballot has to be preserved to authenticate if they followed the law. Because if the law says every vote has to come from a legal citizen, then by default the election officials have to preserve chain of custody affirming what the law has required. And that's why they're terrified of the Save Act. It changes this country dramatically. And the reason Republican cucks in the Senate are allowing the Democrats to filibuster is simply because they have made backroom deals. Hey, you guys, when you get in, don't remove the filibuster. And when we get in, we won't remove it. But the problem is the number of senators on the Democrat side who agree that the filibuster needs to remain has been reducing every election cycle. In 2020, you had Kirsten Cinema and Joe Mansion. By 2023, they were both gone. And now you have two less Democrats that agree to keep this the filibuster. I'd say I'd say John Featherman. Feetman is probably the only Democrat right now that I can say he would vote no in a hypothetical situation to get rid of the filibuster. He's the only one. So, if we know the Democrats will get rid of the filibuster if they ever overtake the White House and Senate and the House of Representatives, why not be proactive as opposed to reactive? Why not go in and do it yourself? It's going to happen. And this idea that the filibuster is an institutional check and balance, I disagree with it. I've said it many times. The filibuster came into effect by mistake. By mistake. It was never part of the Senate as an institution. Aaron Burr when he was vice president, one of his last, you know, final speeches that he gave to the Senate back then was advice on rules that were redundant. So they had a rule called the previous question motion. this Matt if debate was occurring on the Senate floor to end that debate essentially invoke closure one would just need to get a simple majority to agree to overcome the debate Burr said this was a redundant rule because back then no one was using the rule because debates weren't endless so he said yeah remove it you know make the Senate rule book the Senate manual a little bit less messy. And lo and behold, the Senate after Burr's ouster as vice president came in and removed the previous question motion, meaning they created a system where you could not overcome debate. But the filibuster wasn't being used. It wasn't a thing then until you, you know, go all the way into the civil rights era, into, you know, the slavery era, into the critical moments of American history. That's when the filibuster started getting used. It wasn't like senates of old weren't using it because it was expected that when a debate occurs, you debate and then you overcome debate and you go to voting. That's how it's supposed to work. We aren't supposed to have this mechanism, this tool a minority party can use to like gridlock the Senate, gridlock critical legisl legislation, especially government funding. So the filibuster is not some founding principle. wasn't something, you know, John Adams was writing down when he was coming up with the idea of a bike caral legislature. Yeah. Like come on. It's it's just a a hindrance. It's a roadblock for no reason. It doesn't do anything. All it does is force these stupid compromises that help no one. You know what I want? I want if the Democrats take control fairly. I want them to implement their policies without Republicans having the ability to stop them. And when Republicans are in power, I want them to have full power. What's the point of a national vote if the party that didn't get voted in as the majority of course gets to have this significant say on the direction of legislation? I think it's stupid. Compromises should exist naturally. It should be like, "Hey, that might go too far. Let's renegotiate." people within the Republican party or Democrat party should be the ones saying, "Oh, let's tweak this. Let's like compromise should be natural. If the voters truly wanted compromise, they would vote for candidates that talked about compromise. If it was a market demand, then you would have voters say, "Okay, we want compromise." and the political class would would say, "Okay, we'll assimilate that and we'll start to think about compromise naturally." But the moment it's forced creates tension for no reason and these gridlocks, I I I hate it. I despise the filibuster. I hate it so much. Yeah. Like we can laugh and say, "Oh, we used it before." Yeah, sure. What is that? Who cares? If if Republicans, if conservatives use the filibuster at certain points to our benefit, great. Nice. But I can count a 100 million other times that mechanism has prevented this country from moving forward and has slowed down or completely blocked critical legislation like the Save Act. So, this is a good play from John Cornin, not Ken Paxton and Trump. Trump says, "Who I endorse has to drop out." Ken Paxton says, "I'll consider dropping out if the Senate leadership says we're getting rid of the uh the filibuster or at the very least get rid of the of the zombie filibuster." That's what it's called. It's when nothing has to happen. like a group of senators just threaten the filibuster and the party in control knows they can't get to 60 votes so the legislation stops. At least make it a standing filibuster where if the Democrats want to stop legislation, they have to stand physically on the Senate floor giving a speech and they can't stop no breaks until they get tired. That's I'm I'm okay with that. But this like idea that a few senators say we'll filibuster it, we won't pass it, where the the minority leader says, "We won't pass it." And then it just never goes anywhere. That's ridiculous to me. And getting getting rid of the filibuster is easy. You need 51 senators who vote to change the rule. That's it. It's not you don't need the 60. Like you can't filibuster the rule change because it's not legislation. It's a procedural change like how do we do things? How do we debate? You know, and guess who runs the rules committee in the Senate? Mitch McConnell. So, he needs to come in and say, "All right, [clears throat] we'll do it, Mr. President. That's it. It's very simple. Paxton should replace Bondi." I agree. If we're replacing Christy Gnome, I mean, in terms of unpopularity in Trump's cab cabinet, like Pam Bondi's up there. I mean, super Trump fans don't Oh, I love Bondi. Yeah, but when Bondi goes before Congress and says, "The Dow Jones is at 50,000, so why do we care about the Epstein files?" Like that's like so so out of touch. Like [laughter] what are you saying? You know, so that that's why that's why they're going to get fired. I I think we could do with Ken Paxton. That's who I wanted to be. Well, Matt Gates and then Ken Paxton. I thought Ken Paxton would have been such a good US attorney general because he knows how to operate. Pam Bondi's experience as an attorney general was eight years in Florida and I don't know a significant case she moved. Ken Paxton has defended so many first amendment second amendment cases. He has held so many big corporations accountable. The guy has busted election fraud operations. He knows the ins and outs of how the Democrat NOS's work. He's been going after media matters. like he's doing things that only a high IQ, high agency, high capacity individual is capable of and he's done it for years in Texas. I thought he would have been the perfect natural choice to be US attorney general. But Pam Bondi came in and I think the idea of Bondi was she would lead a force, you know, and she would just kind of be the face of it. But the soldiers, the US attorneys were doing all the work. But Bondi is so uncarismatic. She has been incapable of getting the Senate to do something about the blue slip abuse where Democrats prevent US attorneys from coming in. Bondi has ruined the prosecution of Leticia James and James Comey by not even reading the rule book about when a acting attorney's tenure expires. I think like these are amateur mistakes. What Ken Paxton would come in and do is make sure he has all his key players in place to do something to be aggressive on day one. We didn't get that from Bondi because she was picked because of her ability to look good in front of the camera honestly and to be a face of the DOJ while the technocrats, you know, the technocratic attorneys do all the work. But the problem is because Bondi isn't a high capability individual, she hasn't been able to get all the critical people in place, all the technocrats in place to do the work behind the scenes. Like the DOJ moves slower as a result. You know, I'll give her I'll give her credit for the Don Lemon prosecution. 39 actors, all of them have been arrested, including Don Lemon, charged amazing stuff there. But like she fumbled a few other things and they were big things. Like we needed Leticia James to be prosecuted. Not even for the sentence, but we needed that thing to go to trial. We needed like a jury to say she defraed the government when she lied on a mortgage application. The optics of that would have been beautiful. like, whoa, this lady who spent so much time as New York attorney general going after Trump got charged with an identical nature of crime that she accused Trump of committing. I think that was beautiful. I think the idea that that was fumbled because of a pro procedural error is bizarre to me. And now the statute of limitations is up. we can't go after James Comey because this crime happened like five and five five years and five five months ago like yeah it's like ah you know what for replacing Christy Gnome and to be fair I'm I'm not I wasn't like like a Christine Gnome super fan but I did agree with her that the deportations had to be universal Christine Gnome and Greg Beavino they agreed that the deportations needed to, you know, go beyond criminal illegals. Like the focus had to be universal. Even though I don't agree with the ad campaign costing $200 million, it did kind of work. You know, she did incentivize a lot of people to leave. I I like creative. I'll give I'll give Christy Gnome that. My question when she got appointed was what does she know about national security? But she did surprise me in a good way. Christy Gnome like yeah sure she was banging Corey Luwendowski and that was a bad scandal. Um she did that thing with with the dog. I think she like I don't know. Did she kill the dog? I don't know. I can't remember what she did with the dog, but it was just like crazy. The internet hated that. What else did she do? Yeah. So she was just scandalfilled. She also didn't necessarily handle the Minnesota situation like a professional. Trump came out and was like, "Oh, it was sad what happened." Christy Gnome came out and was like, "She's a domestic terrorist." I'm like, "You know, maybe you should chill out. Relax." Like, you can believe that without screaming it because it makes makes you come across as like heartless. And so, you know, those mistakes added up and the controversies, the scandals, they all kind of the private jet jet stuff, it all kind of added up and then Trump was like, "Okay, you're kind of like a liability now as opposed to an asset. So, you're gone." I do think I mean, every administration goes through people for different reasons. You know, Mike Waltz was US national security adviser and he got a demotion to be like the UN ambassador because he was like leaking secrets to Netanyahu or something like that. Leaking communications from the internal Trump team. Uh what else happened? Or Signal Gate as well. Like all these little things happen, but it they only rise to the level of a complete firing and she's now going to be like some special envoy. like they just made up a position to keep her like you know Christy don't go around and go on the view and start disparaging the administration. You are no longer secretary of the DHS, one of the most heavily funded agent departments in the federal government. You are now going to be an an envoy for the Western Hemisphere. It's like, yeah, that's a demotion without really saying it. But yeah, I I I do think if we're firing people, I I I I can I can envision a few more people getting shuffled around. The people that are going to stay for sure in my opinion are Scott Besset. He has done an excellent job keeping this economy structured despite all the shocks, the tariffs and ups and downs, just keeping investors confident. So the Treasury Department has been wellrun. They've also looked into criminal activity like Scott Beth. He's just gay and efficient. That's all. Right. Uh who else has been efficient and gay or just efficient? I'd say I'd say the FBI, uh Operation Summer Heat was objectively successful. The task forces to Memphis to different cities. Crime has gone down. Cash Patel is credited for credited for that. right now. He has his own like little scandals like you know but you know those are everyone everyone has scandals but none rise to Christy Gnome's level like um who else has been really solid and efficient in their role. Uh Tulsi Gabbard's been quiet but investigating election integrity. It's good stuff. Uh, PT at Fanny May Mack, he's been doing his thing. Um, trying to like think think about this the biggest successes um to attribute it to an a department. It's hard to come up with it. But generally speaking, you know, like I don't think there's a problem with the labor secretary. It's just like I think every problem might have to do with the people dealing with accountability. Like have Democrats who participated in the rigged 2020 fraud election, have they been prosecuted? No. Not a single one. So it's like who's responsible for prosecuting them? Well, Pam Bondi. Has she done it? No. Will she do it? Obviously not. Okay. So then, so it's kind of like you have to go through that process. But yeah, I think most Trump secretaries have like Pete Hexath has been doing his job. Amazing job. He's bombed all the cartels. They're all wiped off the face of the earth now. Like that's amazing work. You know, the joint chiefs of staff's chairman U. Dan Kaine, amazing job. the strategy to get Maduro. Fantastic. So like almost every single person has been on their agame, but it's like the few that haven't deal with the most sensitive things. Like how did have you arrested all the crooks? No. George Soros is still spending every NGO out there. Still funding every like what's have you investigated media matters for disrupting this nation's politics? No. What are you doing then? like you're just going on TV on Fox. I remember there was a time where Pam Bondi was on Fox News every single week. No, sorry. Every day. It felt like every day. Every other day at least. She'd go on like Laura Ingram. Then she'd be on Hannity. Then she'd be on Jesse Waters. Then she'd show up with Greg Gutfeld making jokes. I'm like, "Lady, when do you have time to like what? WHAT ARE YOU DOING? LOCK IN. You know, focus. We need some arrest. So anyways, I do think maybe the under secretaries have done a great job. Obviously, whoever's like behind Pete Hexath, like the under secretary for the Navy, for the AR, like those guys have been doing an amazing job because the military is so efficient. like that operation like the guys running the intelligence apparatus in this country they've been doing their job like so efficient like how did they track the Ayatollah like oh my gosh like do you know how hard how paranoid Iran would have been yet the CIA still had sources how about Venezuela they knew where Maduro was like every night and they just picked a night ah the weather's good today let's go and they knew where he was that Like, so those guys are they're doing their thing, but like Ian Omar is still running around running her mouth. Like, when when is she going to get denaturalized for committing fraud? And when are all the Somali going to go? When is something going to happen? So, I don't know, one of those things. But I'm really happy with what Ken Paxton has come out with. I think pegging whether he drops out or not on the Save Act is it's amazing. It's benevolent. It's magnanimous. He's thinking of the of the future. It's ppeacious. He's saying, "Look, even if I lose, I'm getting something out of this, which is legislation that saves this country. And let's see what the Rhinos do. Are they going to give in to Paxton's demands or not? Gas up to 30 to 50 cents a gallon. Food prices will be next. Yeah, that tends to happen when you blow up one of the biggest oil producers, but we'll see. I mean if this prolong if this is like a prolonged thing then you know gas prices will go up for a prolonged period of time but if we read tomorrow that it's over I guess yeah they'll they'll stabilize um but I don't think Trump is like interested in seeing this go throughout the midterms. Like I think that's crazy. he would lose the midterms if we're still bombing Iran in like October and the elections next week. So, this has to end at least like by May. Maybe [clears throat] not May. Uh end of April. Well, that's by May. Yeah. Like this has to kind of go because this summer you have an event, the World Cup. You kind of don't want to be bombing countries during the World Cup and then you have the nation's 250th anniversary, America's birthday. You might want to just kind of, you know, have the B2s at home for the parades. Yeah. You know, DC is going to be full of patriotism. I'll probably be there. Well, not probably, definitely. Right. I want to go experience that. whatever the show is going to be, I want to see it and I'll live stream myself, do videos out there. So, you don't necessarily want to be in a war at that point. You want to kind of get this done like fast, you know? So, so gas prices do come down like people will notice like, "Hey man, uh my gas prices were lower before that war." I think that's BS. and they will go vote Democrat or they'll stay at home. Conservatives need to be convinced to do things. Liberals will vote because they're high propensity. You know, they'll vote because that's all they do. They have no jobs. So, the only thing useful in their week is to go out on a well, not go out. They stay at home and fill out mailin ballots and the extra ones that showed up showed up too for their dead grandparents. That's what liberals do. Conservatives you know, you'll need to like knock on their door and remind them the stakes. Otherwise, they don't care because they don't rely on the government. Only people who rely on the government for to exist are like heavily constantly thinking about when's the election, when's the election. Especially when you're not getting your food stamps, you're definitely interested who your congressman, congresswoman or man is. Yeah. Even in super red districts, the turnout isn't really that great. But you look at the Democrat districts, even the ones that are super blue, it's like the turnout is always the same, like really high. Anyways, ladies and gentlemen, let's pray this works. Lord, we pray that this works, that these people in Congress get some courage to do the right thing in Jesus' name. Amen. All right. Thank you all very much for watching. Let me read some comments here. Ah, you guys are doing the thing you do all the time, which is talk about anything but what what we're talking the subject matter. Anyways, all right. Good night. Hey Google, turn on all lights. Okay.

I'm glad to be back on YouTube! Find me on X: https://x.com/BehizyTweets Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/behizygram TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@donbehizy?lang=en Praise the LORD!