IS THIS WHY THE EPSTEIN FILES ARE SEALED?

I learned today, for example, that I'm in the Epstein files. >> Oh, really? >> And here's the way I'm in there. >> Three million documents and many of them are emails that people have sent at different times. Some of the most famous people in the world have sent emails to Epstein and now those are all out there in the public to see. >> Some of it I I don't talk about because I have a fair amount of inside information and I'm just watchful about not getting near the line. But >> what do you mean by inside information? I mean information that that I might have gotten from government agencies that are clients or that I might have gotten because clients were uh were implicated. Like I learned today, for example, this morning on the way over here that I'm in the Epstein files. >> Oh, really? >> And here's the way I'm in there is that someone sent Epstein an article that I wrote called Fooling Ourselves into War. They sent that to Epstein. So that's an example of being in the Epstein files and yet obviously never having met Epstein. But I won't be the first guest, Stephen, that you've had uh that says that um it was an intelligence operation. Why the US government is reluctant to be more uh transparent? Some of it is national security. Some of it is, let's imagine an ally of ours uh is involved in in that operation. So there's a reluctance and there's a question, could the public handle it? Could we handle it? Could the US public handle it? My take personally, absolutely

Gavin de Becker explains that the files contain millions of documents, including emails sent to Epstein by third parties. He says someone’s name can appear simply because an article or message was forwarded, not because of direct contact. He also notes ongoing theories about possible intelligence connections and suggests national security concerns may limit full public transparency. #podcast #epstein #secretservice #cia #jeffreyepstein