We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Attempting to reconnect
Triggernometry · 31.7K views · 1.3K likes Short
Analysis Summary
Ask yourself: “Whose perspective is missing here, and would the story change if they were included?”
Responsibility reframing
Reframing a situation so the person who caused harm appears to be the real victim, and the actual victim appears responsible. It forces observers to reconsider who deserves sympathy, distracting from the original wrongdoing.
Freyd's DARVO framework (1997) — Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender
Worth Noting
Positive elements
- This video provides a concise summary of the geological skeptic's view on climate history, specifically the role of carbon sequestration in rocks.
Be Aware
Cautionary elements
- The use of 'Responsibility Reframing' to categorize scientific consensus as 'religion' effectively shuts down critical analysis of the actual data by framing the debate as a conflict between science and dogma.
Influence Dimensions
How are these scored?About this analysis
Knowing about these techniques makes them visible, not powerless. The ones that work best on you are the ones that match beliefs you already hold.
This analysis is a tool for your own thinking — what you do with it is up to you.
Transcript
We've had very high carbon dioxides in the atmosphere before and what has happened is we've sequested that into carbonate rocks and this has been happening for a long period of time now with those older glaciations the carbonate rock was dolomite which has got 48% of the gas carbon dioxide in it. That's by weight. And so we pulled that carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. And um in younger times, in the last 20% of time, we've pulled carbon dioxide out of the limestone. We've pulled it into carbonri sediments, black shells, into coals, into the shells, into the uh which are now fossils, into carbonri rocks. So that's been sequestered out of the atmosphere. And that process has been going on for at least a billion years. But we certainly have got very good evidence that about 500 million years ago when we had an explosion of life, we had.7% carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. It's gone down to 0.04%. Where's it gone? It's gone into into the rocks into sediments. Now, during that 500 million years, we've had a couple three major ice ages. Yet carbon dioxide has been going down over time. So there's no relationship between temperature and carbon dioxide. >> So why do so many people in the scientific world, in government, in politics, why do so many people believe that there is this strong connection? >> Well, you have you used the word believe and that's a word of religion and politics. is not a word of science.
Video description
Triggernometry is proudly independent. Join our exclusive TRIGGERnometry community on Substack! https://triggernometry.substack.com/ OR Support TRIGGERnometry Here: Bitcoin: bc1qm6vvhduc6s3rvy8u76sllmrfpynfv94qw8p8d5 Shop Merch here - https://shop.triggerpod.co.uk/ Advertise on TRIGGERnometry: marketing@triggerpod.co.uk Find TRIGGERnometry on Social Media: https://twitter.com/triggerpod https://www.facebook.com/triggerpod/ https://www.instagram.com/triggerpod/ About TRIGGERnometry: Stand-up comedians Konstantin Kisin (@konstantinkisin) and Francis Foster (@francisjfoster) make sense of politics, economics, free speech, AI, drug policy and WW3 with the help of presidential advisors, renowned economists, award-winning journalists, controversial writers, leading scientists and notorious comedians.