COMPLETE DESTRUCTION AND CERTAIN DEATH': Trump's Newest Threat to Iran /Lt Col Daniel Davis

Just hours ago, let's take a look at what he said there. Iran, which is beat to hell, has apologized and surrendered to its Middle East neighbors. You're going, "Wow, they actually surrendered." You call for full-scale or unconditional surrender yesterday, and here he's saying the very next day that they have surrendered to their Middle East neighbors. That's interesting. More on that in just a second. The and promised that they will not shoot at them anymore. This promise was only made because of the relentless US and Israeli attack. They were looking to take over and rule the Middle East. It is the first time Iran has ever lost in thousands of years to surrounding Middle Eastern countries. All right, I'm going to push pause on that for just a second cuz he's about to say something else I want to comment on. Let me give you the context. When he says that Peseschkian has surrendered, here's what he's talking about. Earlier this morning, our time the Iranian president went out on a on a kind of a lengthy public broadcast and said that overnight, according to this this interpretation here, uh Peseschkian issued a statement apologizing, not surrendering but apologizing for attacks this past week against neighboring countries, claiming that some attacks were carried out independently by regional commanders without directed due to the loss of communication, further stating that the temporary leadership council has ordered a halt to attacks on these countries unless territory is is used to attack Iran. Now, that's that's what he said. So, he did not say in this which countries he's talking about. Now, there is some confusion. Is he talking about all of the regional actors? Is it Qatar, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, uh Oman, Bahrain? Is he talking about those? Or is he talking about some of the other neighboring countries like Azerbaijan, uh Cyprus, and some of the others that were claimed that Iran has said that they actually did not attack. It's unclear what he meant by that. Um it's interesting just before coming on the air here, I was actually on with Mario Nawfal, who, as you may know, is broadcast from the Middle East. And as we're on the air, uh he said that his alerts went off and that there was an attack somewhere uh in the city where he was broadcasting from. So, uh we didn't get a chance to find out what the results of that was. So, I don't know if That's that's one of the reasons we're wondering what is the definition of neighboring countries and and what is going to be the criteria that they're going to use. Nevertheless, that's what he said. So, when President Trump, Gary, if you can go back to the Truth Social now, blow that up to the full screen, uh when he says that uh that he apologized and surrendered to the Middle East neighbors, I think that's what he meant. So, he didn't surrender to anybody. Uh he did apologize though, so that was by itself interesting. Uh and then he also talked about the Peseschkian that he validated what we have suggested that this dead hand process, that when we went in with the initial uh decapitation strikes and cutting off their communications, that it it automatically triggered all these attacks throughout the country. That's why we had such a high level of fire right from the beginning. But let's get back to where we are here. So, Trump first of all claims that this is the first time they have ever lost. Uh the war is still going on. Nothing has been won or lost by anybody so far. They have said, "Thank you, President Trump." I have said, "You're welcome." That's I That's bizarre. I just got to say. Uh I don't recall, at least nothing publicly, where uh the Peseschkian said he thanked President Trump. And but I guess you're President Trump saying you're welcome. But then he goes on, it turns a little darker. Iran is no longer the bully of the Middle East. They were never the bully of the Middle East. They were always on their back foot because their powerful neighbors were always pushing at them. But I digress. They are instead the loser of the Middle East and will be for many decades until they surrender or more likely completely collapse. Today, Iran will be hit very hard, under serious consideration for complete destruction and certain death because of Iran's bad behavior, are areas and groups of people that were not considered for targeting up until this moment. Thank you for your attention to this matter. And then his weird conclusion that he always puts on there. Uh that by itself, that last section there is uh definitely something I believe everybody in Iran is paying attention to. And um I'm sure that there is something serious behind this. This is probably not one of those where he's just giving into empty rhetoric. When he says, "Today, Iran will be hit very hard, under serious consideration for complete destruction and certain death because of Iran's bad behavior, are areas and groups of people that were not considered for targeting up until this moment of time." That lines up with what uh Secretary Heckseth said from CENTCOM commander uh from the CENTCOM uh headquarters a couple of days ago where he said the biggest strikes are yet to come. He said, "We are building up profound amounts of combat power." So, those two things line up. Uh so, uh but as you're about to see, we are far from having enough to do everything that we want despite President Trump's claims, despite uh the Secretary of War's claims. Uh There there are some real real limitations. And as you're about to see, uh some of those are coming up a lot sooner than we think. It looks to me like President Trump is trying to go with the shock and awe two, a second version from the opening round to try and compel coercion right now. Let me just explain to you. The the pan The White House is in a panic. Guaranteed. There's some big big red flags going on today. You might not see if all you listen to is the rhetoric from Trump you might lose fact of the fact of the reality that he is in real trouble here. Now, I'm going to show you some of the very specific reasons why. First of all, let's take a look at here at the the loss of those radars. Gary had them up there. We are losing a number of very important radars, which we need to be able to track incoming missiles to give warnings, to be able to to fire any air air missiles in retaliation to even potentially intercept Those are being knocked out at a short clip. It shows that the Iranian side has a very sharp focused operation. They understand they have limited means, so they're going after the most important targets first, which are the radars. More concerning is that in the THAAD radar systems, half of America's global THAAD radar systems have now been confirmed with satellite imagery to have been taken out. We only have eight globally, and already in 1 week of war, four of them are gone. That is profound. That is amazing. It is shockingly amazing. But four in a week? What is going to happen? I'm not sure if all eight are in the region or not, but whatever's in the region, four of them have been taken out, which means that the Iranian side, their intelligence and their targeting capacity is still quite good. That they know where the targets are that they need to go after, and then they have the means to actually take them out. That is huge. That is a huge big red flag. We may have more planes and tanks and ships than and and other missiles way more than Iran can match. But it sure shows that the the things that are the most critical, that they understand that and they have a mean to really cause some damage to the United States. Um I want to go now to something that's even more critical than that. And that is in this alleged allegation that everything is going to be okay, that we've got enough of the If I can find the right one here. I think this is the one here. Uh yes, this is This is uh US is facing stockpile depletions in the most important things. There's some things you can replace a lot, some things we have uh a near near term anyway in unlimited capacity. But in the things that matter the most, we have some real problems. As you see here, as of December 2025, uh the missiles missile defense agency's arsenal of SM-3s was 414, and the number of THAAD interceptors was 534. In the June 2025 12-day war, the US expended 30% of its THAAD stockpiles and 80 SM-3s. Production cannot keep pace. Even at quadruple rates, replacing 150 THAAD interceptors takes nearly 5 months. And that's if if we're able to actually produce five, which Trump said yesterday, uh that is a big open question. I have serious doubts that we can even do that at this at this accelerated pace. At this is This is the crucial part right here. This is absolutely vital. At the sustained conflict consumption, the entire US interceptor stockpile could be exhausted in four to five weeks, creating vulnerabilities for NATO, Ukraine, Taiwan, and Japan, all of which depend on US defense supplies. Four to five weeks. That that is probably what Trump had in mind when he said this could go maybe five or six, I think is what he said. Or I think he actually used that four five. This is why, because if if the current rates of consumption, and would they may not because the Iranian uh uh volume of fire has definitely reduced from what it began for various reasons. Some because we've destroyed a lot of their launchers, and some because they're actually pacing how many they fire. So, maybe it's not really four to five weeks. But folks, that's exhausted. Exhausted, not reduced, not limited. It's exhausted. So, if if it's already, as we've seen for many of these the videos that Ted Postol has shown us, is that many of these things aren't are already uh intercepting very many at all. Like like 5% 6% 10% in some cases depending on the platforms that are involved. And if you lose even those and if you lose the radars that's going to come in, you see that that uh attack rate is going to start going up even if the volume fire from Iran goes down, their success rate of hitting the target is going to start going up. And that's a real problem. And to show you what this is reacting to why I said that there's a panic in the White House is it's cuz you're taking a look at what's going on next. So, there was news overnight that the George W. Bush another a third aircraft carrier has now been dispatched to the Middle East. A third aircraft carrier. So, it obviously if we're doing as well as what Secretary H. R. McMaster says, why would you need another one? You said you have overmatch and remember how he was mocking the uh the Iranian side and said, "Oh, that all they can do is look up in the sky and see all these planes flying over and they're just loitering around just waiting." Well, then why would you need another aircraft carrier if you already had mastery of the sky and literally nothing that the enemy could do? That you've already got more than enough. That's why we deployed so much ground-based air power that at the bases and the sea-based ground power from two aircraft carrier strike groups. So, that's an that's an alert that something is going on. Second one is that there has been reports we mentioned yesterday that the 82nd Airborne uh seems to have been alerted. They they had an exercise that they've stopped. Um they haven't announced what they're going to do yet. Lots of talk in the open press. A lot of senior administration officials say, "Yeah, we're actually seriously thinking about a ground invasion about a boots on the ground kind of thing." Lots of talk about the Kurds. Uh that's getting a lot of cold water poured on it from the Iraqi Kurds especially as they're saying both that Barzani, the leader of the Iraqi Kurds as well as some comments from Baghdad to say, "Yeah, we're not doing that." Uh Foreign Minister Araqchi from Iran was also talking to some of his Kurdish counterparts and they say, "No, we're not going to do that." Uh it's less clear if the Ira- Iranian Kurds are going to do anything or not. There's some possibility of that. But, you got to understand that is a small infantry force and and it's not going anywhere. It doesn't have any of the neighbors. They're not marching on anything. They may can do some stuff in their region. That's about the extent of it. Uh the other thing is the the price of oil stays high. It's at last time I checked just before coming on the air here, it was $91 up $1 from the time we checked yesterday. This is causing huge problems. There's has been uh an increase in the price of the gas gallon of gasoline in the United States. A huge increase. Uh the the the biggest increase in the shortest amount of time I saw on the news headline last night that we've ever had which is saying something cuz there have been a few oil shocks in the past. But, apparently the speed with which this has gone up is alarming. And believe me, that's one thing that President Trump pays attention to more than anything because that is what that that affects literally everything not not just because it affects the price of gas uh for every consumer, every voter and it's going up and he has basically made his mark on convincing everybody that he's made the price of gas go down. And now then if as a result of his war of choice, now all of a sudden the price of gas is skyrocketing and going up, that's going to be a big problem with his already low poll numbers heading into the midterms for his party. So, he's got to do something to try and reverse that. That's why I fear he may do something uh crazy here by saying, "Look, we're going to have this big strike tonight and just and I was all specially alarmed that he mentioned in that Truth Social he's going to spread it to areas and people that he had not attacked up to this point." And look, we started off with all the military targets. What are you going to expand to? I mean, there's already been schools girl schoolhouse of girls that has been hit. 150 kids and teachers have been killed. Uh you've had some hospitals have been hit. Other civilian targets have been hit and a number of military targets, too. So, there's been both. But, if you're already hitting these kinds of non-military strikes, what's next? What is What have you not attacked that you're going to attack so far? And why would you have not hit some of these critical military targets at the first because the idea is normally you're going to say you're going to hit the most crucial modes first. The the most vulnerable targets first, the ones that can cause you the most damage first. And so, we've done that for now a week. Well, where are you going to expand to now because you've taken out all the ones that are that considered the most important. Now, you're going to go to secondary targets and secondary criteria. What are those criteria? Because it sounds almost like you're talking about maybe more civilian stuff and we have bragged at length about how we don't target civilians. In the aftermath of this strike that killed the kids at the school, uh you know, we kept saying, "Well, I we don't know what happened yet. But, we know we don't target those." Well, is that going to change? Because President Trump seems to indicate that he's about to do something different and whole categories and peoples to use his words that weren't attacked before. So, I have some concerns about that.

** NEW MERCH ** Jackets & Sweatshirts, Thermo Mugs!! Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavisDeepDive?ref=seller-platform-mcnav