Anthony Pompliano

In-group/Out-group framing

AI detected as: Crisis-solution Framing

Leveraging your tendency to automatically trust information from "our people" and distrust outsiders. Once groups are established, people apply different standards of evidence depending on who is speaking.

Social Identity Theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979); Cialdini's Unity principle (2016)

In-group/Out-group framing

AI detected as: Problem-agitation-solution (pas) Framing

Leveraging your tendency to automatically trust information from "our people" and distrust outsiders. Once groups are established, people apply different standards of evidence depending on who is speaking.

Social Identity Theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979); Cialdini's Unity principle (2016)

Responsibility reframing

AI detected as: Narrative Reframing Of Geopolitical Tragedy Into A 'bullish' Financial Catalyst.

Reframing a situation so the person who caused harm appears to be the real victim, and the actual victim appears responsible. It forces observers to reconsider who deserves sympathy, distracting from the original wrongdoing.

Freyd's DARVO framework (1997) — Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender

Moralization Of Asset Retention

This technique was detected by AI but doesn't yet map to our curated glossary. We're tracking its usage patterns.

Financial Complexity Obfuscation

This technique was detected by AI but doesn't yet map to our curated glossary. We're tracking its usage patterns.

Narrative Convergence

This technique was detected by AI but doesn't yet map to our curated glossary. We're tracking its usage patterns.

Causal Oversimplification Of Geopolitical Conflict To Serve A Financial Narrative.

This technique was detected by AI but doesn't yet map to our curated glossary. We're tracking its usage patterns.

Normalization Of Complex Financial Circularity

This technique was detected by AI but doesn't yet map to our curated glossary. We're tracking its usage patterns.

Moral framing

AI detected as: Identity-based Framing (linking Asset Ownership To Moral Character And Personal Sovereignty).

Presenting a complex issue with genuine tradeoffs as a simple choice between right and wrong. Once something is framed as a moral issue, compromise feels like complicity and disagreement feels immoral rather than reasonable.

Haidt's Moral Foundations Theory; Lakoff's framing research (2004)

Responsibility reframing

Reframing a situation so the person who caused harm appears to be the real victim, and the actual victim appears responsible. It forces observers to reconsider who deserves sympathy, distracting from the original wrongdoing.

Freyd's DARVO framework (1997) — Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender

Moral framing

Presenting a complex issue with genuine tradeoffs as a simple choice between right and wrong. Once something is framed as a moral issue, compromise feels like complicity and disagreement feels immoral rather than reasonable.

Haidt's Moral Foundations Theory; Lakoff's framing research (2004)

Single-cause framing

Attributing a complex outcome to a single cause, ignoring the web of contributing factors. A clean explanation is more satisfying and easier to act on than a complicated one. Especially effective when the proposed cause is something you already dislike.

Fallacy of the single cause; Kahneman's WYSIATI principle

In-group/Out-group framing

Leveraging your tendency to automatically trust information from "our people" and distrust outsiders. Once groups are established, people apply different standards of evidence depending on who is speaking.

Social Identity Theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979); Cialdini's Unity principle (2016)

Social proof

Presenting the popularity or consensus of an opinion as evidence that it's correct. When you see many others have endorsed something, it feels safer to follow. This shortcut can be manufactured — fake reviews, inflated counts, and cherry-picked polls all simulate consensus.

Cialdini's Social Proof principle (1984); Asch conformity experiments (1951)